LamieRobertson
Not awoke
You won’t like me at all then….judging from remarks made by some I’m definitely far rightCan't stand the far right, but I hope and expect to see the law applied equally
You won’t like me at all then….judging from remarks made by some I’m definitely far rightCan't stand the far right, but I hope and expect to see the law applied equally
perhaps it’s because they’ve seen the video…you support him then…..and what posts to date have led you to make that comment …I’m intriguedI guess we'll have to wait for the verdict. Good job some of you aren't jurors.
I support the process of a fair trial. Do you?perhaps it’s because they’ve seen the video…you support him then
I support the process of a fair trial. Do you?
He’s not on remand ..he was bailedI am shocked that the intelligent people who do their own research and don't believe the msm hadn't yet worked out;
He hasn't gone on trial yet
He has pleaded not guilty
He is currently on remand
He is suspended from the labour party
Couldn't find out the sentencing guidelines for the charge he is facing
Didn't seem to read previous posts on this on this thread
Yet are already accusing the judiciary, the legislature, the security forces of two tier justice and perceiving paths of promotion from the Labour party
If that's the clever people in society, I'm glad I'm a thicky sheep
According to you it's enough to have watched a video.of course…where have I said I don’t..you were the one with the allegations not me
I guess we'll have to wait for the verdict. Good job some of you aren't jurors.
Who is accusing the judiciary and legislature of two tier justice? We can judge that better after the trial, and after we’ve heard his version of events.I am shocked that the intelligent people who do their own research and don't believe the msm hadn't yet worked out;
He hasn't gone on trial yet
He has pleaded not guilty
He is currently on remand
He is suspended from the labour party
Couldn't find out the sentencing guidelines for the charge he is facing
Didn't seem to read previous posts on this on this thread
Yet are already accusing the judiciary, the legislature, the security forces of two tier justice and perceiving paths of promotion from the Labour party
If that's the clever people in society, I'm glad I'm a thicky sheep
I suggest you read whatever post you’ve read again instead of jumping to conclusions as per normalAccording to you it's enough to have watched a video.
That's why you are so clever. He was in custody on 6th September at his last court appearance. I hadn't seen anything in the evil msm to say he had been released on bail. Which is interesting bearing in mind bail hearings are in open court.He’s not on remand ..he was bailed
We all support fair trials GB. But fair sentencing too, surely - which might get more attention here (IF he’s found guilty). Personally I’d have preferred it if people previously imprisoned for little more than shouting in the street, had received a more useful punishment than prison, but unfortunately that’s now set a precedent.I support the process of a fair trial. Do you?
lol I do like a bit of humour …well postedThat's why you are so clever. He was in custody on 6th September at his last court appearance. I hadn't seen anything in the evil msm to say he had been released on bail. Which is interesting bearing in mind bail hearings are in open court.
It's a conspiracy I tell ya
I've no doubt the video will be shown to the jurors as evidence.perhaps it’s because they’ve seen the video…you support him then…..and what posts to date have led you to make that comment …I’m intrigued
He was remanded in August at Westminster Court, appeared via video link to Snaresbrook Crown Court and trial date set to January, but remained in custody.He’s not on remand ..he was bailed
So you were in court and heard all the evidence and read the sentencing remarks in these cases? Given apparently all they did was merely shouting in the street?We all support fair trials GB. But fair sentencing too, surely - which might get more attention here (IF he’s found guilty). Personally I’d have preferred it if people previously imprisoned for little more than shouting in the street, had received a more useful punishment than prison, but unfortunately that’s now set a precedent.
I'd say that "we need to cut all their throats" is inciting murder rather than just violence.For those unaware, Ricky Jones (Labour Councillor) is up in front of the beak shortly for comments made in public around the time of the summer riots where he appeared to incite violence, I'm sure many of you have seen the footage.
If found guilty, what sort of sentence should he expect. I would genuinly love to know what the great and good of NSC think about this.
Then why is there a sentencing thread up before the verdict is reached?We all support fair trials GB. But fair sentencing too, surely - which might get more attention here (IF he’s found guilty). Personally I’d have preferred it if people previously imprisoned for little more than shouting in the street, had received a more useful punishment than prison, but unfortunately that’s now set a precedent.
Actually it could be said you were in one of your earlier posts. The one where you felt it necessary to refer to even handed.Who is accusing the judiciary and legislature of two tier justice? We can judge that better after the trial, and after we’ve heard his version of events.
If it is merely shouting in the street, no doubt he’ll be acquitted, but that’s not what charges he’s on.So you were in court and heard all the evidence and read the sentencing remarks in these cases? Given apparently all they did was merely shouting in the street?
Jail.For those unaware, Ricky Jones (Labour Councillor) is up in front of the beak shortly for comments made in public around the time of the summer riots where he appeared to incite violence, I'm sure many of you have seen the footage.
If found guilty, what sort of sentence should he expect. I would genuinly love to know what the great and good of NSC think about this.
I don’t believe MSM covered his bail …..but there are a few commentators I follow who state he was bailed for Xmas…can’t help further….if I’m proved wrong so be it..I’ll hold my hand upI've no doubt the video will be shown to the jurors as evidence.
Why do cases like this have to have 'sides'?
He was remanded in August at Westminster Court, appeared via video link to Snaresbrook Crown Court and trial date set to January, but remained in custody.
I‘ve tried searching the result of a bail application in December but cannot find a result. Can you help please?