Goldstone Rapper
Rediffusion PlayerofYear
Not actually true. PR and preferential systems are different systems.
PR is about matching share of the national vote to the share of the seats.
A preferential voting system is, yes, about marking out preferences. It brings other factors in such as next preferences and which party you definitely wouldn't want in power.
So under PR, if the BNP got 5% of the vote they would get 5% of the seats. Under a preferential system, such as STV, it is likely they would get 0% of the seats as most voters would not mark the BNP candidate amongst their 2nd, 3rd or 4th preferences.
Another way of looking at the difference is that if Lib Dems got 25% of the national vote but were 2nd preference of all Tories and Labour voters, under PR the Lib Dems would get 25% of seats, but probably closer to 50% of seats under STV.
PR is about matching share of the national vote to the share of the seats.
A preferential voting system is, yes, about marking out preferences. It brings other factors in such as next preferences and which party you definitely wouldn't want in power.
So under PR, if the BNP got 5% of the vote they would get 5% of the seats. Under a preferential system, such as STV, it is likely they would get 0% of the seats as most voters would not mark the BNP candidate amongst their 2nd, 3rd or 4th preferences.
Another way of looking at the difference is that if Lib Dems got 25% of the national vote but were 2nd preference of all Tories and Labour voters, under PR the Lib Dems would get 25% of seats, but probably closer to 50% of seats under STV.
No under PR you get preferential voting which is more democratic so all seats would have more counts an example.
First prefernce - you vote for your chosen canditate
second preference you vote for whoever you would like to win if you first prefernce fails.
count
- if a candatate gets over 50 % of vote at first count the are elected.
- If vote split between two (or more depending on share of vote)the you go to a second count where the canitate with the least votes both first and second prefernce is elimated, and so forth.
It removes the need for tactical votig and is far more democratic, but unfortunatly not great for the tories, as they have very poor % of votes in ahuge amount of consituencies, and even in the ones where they are srtong the liklehood is that many labour second prefernce votes would go to liberals and vica versa therefore they would be lucky to have got maybe 200 seats at the last election.
Last edited: