Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,868
I agree that it's OTT in places - it could be dialled down here and there (though the repetition underlines the constancy of self-harm for example). My take on the Harold & Julia 'bond' is that having replaced the son that Harold lost, they could never bin off Jude, who had essentially become Jacob to Harold.
I outlined the plot to my missus and she cannot fathom why I'd carry on with such a depressing, miserable story (she's an advocate for books as a happy escape and loves a Disney film )
It’s a testament to the author that she can keep you reading while repeatedly presenting familiar ground, and yes, good point that it underscores the consistency, obsessiveness of the cutting behaviour. As I read it I did wonder how much, if any was drawn from the author’s own personal well, or from people she knew maybe, or through her former job as a journalist.
For some reason the use of ‘Judy’ really grated
Yes, definitely not one for your other half by the sound of it