Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] What an arse







Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,339
A hole in their defence ?

They also scored at the arse end of the game.

To quote Python- His name is 'Inthenetia Buttocks'
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,042
The Fatherland
Yes, it took ages to get to the bottom of this.
Whilst I prefer to stay humble and respectful I couldn’t help but glut when the decision went our way.
 




Madafwo

I'm probably being facetious.
Nov 11, 2013
1,766
I guess that's what Bournemouth get for having Arabella Weir in their side.
 












US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,812
Cleveland, OH
From the real-time footage on the TV, Mitoma was out of frame. So when JP first played that pass, my first thought was "who the f**k was that to?". Followed by "whoa, who's that? Where the f**k did he come from?". Then "is that Mitoma?" And then " holy crap! We scored!"

It literally seemed like he'd come out of nowhere.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,042
The Fatherland




Albion my Albion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 6, 2016
19,927
Indiana, USA
Good thing Mitoma doesn't have hair like Cucurella.
 


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,169
Truro
The vision and perfect weight on that pass by JP to completely dissect their defence was just pure FILTH. That pic captures it perfectly.
Yes, I watched the replay on TV many times, but couldn’t work out the path of the ball through the defenders. It looked diagonal, but that pic makes sense of it.
 


Javeaseagull

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 22, 2014
2,866
What a ridiculous situation we have got ourselves into. Minutely examining whether someones pubes are offside when the player is not even in the Penalty box. The time wasted to examine something that could in no way be decrilbed as goal haninging. The VAR system is bollox but it makes money so we are stuck with it. It’s still bollox because it has not stopped discussion it has generated more. No problem with that but it holds up the game unnecessarily.
 










tronnogull

Well-known member
May 17, 2010
617
So if Mitoma had been leaning forward a little more a brilliant goal could have been chalked off - his feet are miles onside. The offside law is an ass .
Yes, if they changed the offside law so it was only the position of player's feet which determined offside, then it would be much more straightforward to judge and also much more in keeping with the intent of the offside law.......
 




dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
56,054
Burgess Hill
Yes, if they changed the offside law so it was only the position of player's feet which determined offside, then it would be much more straightforward to judge and also much more in keeping with the intent of the offside law.......
……until someone scores with a brilliant diving header that would have been off
 


Braggfan

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
May 12, 2014
1,998
What I don't understand about offside is, if Mitoma's shoulder is what they were looking at there. And if his should is offside by an inch or so, then they disallow the goal. But by that logic how did that Roma goal get given last year? Was that just an appalling decision? Because its so clear that the Roma player's arm, should and head were all past the player.
18aejxn4pymc1.jpeg
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here