Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
So what would your team be?In terms of who to keep, my list stretches as far as Pieterson, Flintoff and Broad.
So what would your team be?In terms of who to keep, my list stretches as far as Pieterson, Flintoff and Broad.
And that's the problem... doesn't look much better to me, unfortunately. I'm sure there are loads of people on here who see more county cricket then I do but from what I have seen and read etc, it doesn't seem like anyone is making an inarguable case for selection. The guys in the team now aren't either it's true, but wholesale changes for players who aren't any better won't get us anywhere.God knows! Although I would only want Pieterson, Flintoff and Broad involved in the long-term, there aren't enough replacements currently to be able to get rid of everyone else. With that in mind, for the next test (ignoring injuries) I'd play:
1) Cook
2) Vaughan
3) Shah
4) Pieterson
5) No idea, but not Bell or Collingwood
6) Flintoff
7) Prior
8) Broad
9) Rashid
10) Harmison
11) Jones/Anderson
50/8
Smashing.
50/8
Flintoff out.
Fair enough, I'd agree even though I'm not sure who could come in (beyond Shah for Bell which has been blatant for AGES).I do agree with you there, but at least it would be an attempt to change things. Persisting with shit players totally out of form for AGES is unforgivable, but it's exactly what we continue to do. I'm the same as you - I don't see a plethora of players knocking on the door, but there are one or two and we HAVE to freshen things up just to be seen to be doing something.