Wasn't that also a repeat offence?
This is the first one.
Much how I would like a 30 point deduction for them
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] West Ham points deduction surely......
- Thread starter Insel affe
- Start date
Wasn't that also a repeat offence?
This is the first one.
Much how I would like a 30 point deduction for them
Hampster Gull
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,465
They are pitch invading because they don’t like their new 57k capacity stadium and perhaps more importantly are in threat of relegation. And I understand their invasions repeated four times today
seagulls4ever
New member
- Oct 2, 2003
- 4,338
I never said it was OK to support the move if it guarantees success. But of course if you are convinced to move from your home, you want it to benefit the club. It doesn't look to have done so, and part of the reason for that is because Gold/Sullivan haven't as of yet lived up to their pledges to try and make them a top club. Also, they made a profit of about £50 million last year, but they admitted their profit would have been pretty much the same had they remained at their old stadium. In the end, the stadium move has done nothing for them, and when I look at their stadium, it depresses me. They are stuck there for the next 100 years.
Nah, too busy bragging over beating Spurs to it.
It was 1 occasion, it would be completely different if it was 2/3 times and they already had a warning.
warmleyseagull
Well-known member
11/12
SussexGold
New member
- Feb 26, 2018
- 4
Points deduction ��
Not even a big issue what happened, few unhappy people nothing much else happened, it’s a matter for the club
Not even a big issue what happened, few unhappy people nothing much else happened, it’s a matter for the club
Unless the law has changed in the past couple of seasons, Noble is very fortunate not to have been sent off. Not saying he should be, morally, but that’s happened before in that instance.
Punishment wise, a suspended points deduction would probably be the sensible thing - otherwise they’ll be on the pitch every game.
Punishment wise, a suspended points deduction would probably be the sensible thing - otherwise they’ll be on the pitch every game.
Last edited:
Jackthelad
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 1,071
I would love to see them go down.
theboybilly
Well-known member
So would Millwall
el punal
Well-known member
What? I don't suppose the FA give a flying f*** whether the Olympic/London stadium is a Championship stadium or not. On what evidence do you give that the FA favour West Ham above other clubs? I will grant you that it will be derisory fine that the FA will issue West Ham, let's see. Let's also see whether they will insist on part of the stadium being shut too. Deducting points? Fat chance!
el punal
Well-known member
Yes, and it was paid for by tax payer's money.
Cockney council tax by any chance?
Could'nt he have made do with a badge letting everyone know which gender he identified with. Tosser..
Weststander
Well-known member
This from some agitator Keiran Maguire
The FA probably don't - but the people involved in making the stadium a 'legacy' might be! The 54K Pretendence today (although I don't believe West Ham have that many fans!) might temporarily satisfy them, but if the National Treasure (cough) they're supposed to be protecting as a legacy is host to, say, Burton Albion in front of 10 or 20K fans next season they might feel its destiny does not lie in being a tax-payer subsidised facility for an undeserving football club.
I hope Leyton Orient screw them for an absolute mint when they have to ground share!
- Jan 30, 2008
- 831
You melts our all the same these lads are fightin for there club and you lot go all pc Mavis Reilly.
One word
Passioninit Fans
regards
DR
One word
Passioninit Fans
regards
DR
dsr-burnley
Well-known member
- Aug 15, 2014
- 2,625
Can we have a recount?
West Ham have never been anything special. Certainly nowhere near as special as they think they are. 32 teams have finished first or second in the English top division; West Ham aren't one of them.
There were three pitch invasions today, one after each goal. None of them much of a show, just a few nutters, not a massed rank. Burnley weren't very tactful about it - the first "invasion" caused a 3+ minute delay immediately after the first goal, before West Ham eventually kicked off (in footballing terms!) and Burnley scored again 33 seconds later! Way to calm the situation, guys.
Can we have a recount?
West Ham have never been anything special. Certainly nowhere near as special as they think they are. 32 teams have finished first or second in the English top division; West Ham aren't one of them.
There were three pitch invasions today, one after each goal. None of them much of a show, just a few nutters, not a massed rank. Burnley weren't very tactful about it - the first "invasion" caused a 3+ minute delay immediately after the first goal, before West Ham eventually kicked off (in footballing terms!) and Burnley scored again 33 seconds later! Way to calm the situation, guys.
That PPF is the parody account.
Kylegreen-1
New member
I’m sure it’ll be turned into a fine for Burnley somehow