- Thread starter
- #4,181
i'm not on about immigrants specifically , there are plenty of home grown scroungers too......plenty.
Most of whom attended Eton.
i'm not on about immigrants specifically , there are plenty of home grown scroungers too......plenty.
The more that arrive and who hang around at the tax payers expense claiming bogus asylum is never going to be a good thingi think there is a real chance the country will be bankrupted soon , there is too much all round pressure on the economy and a huge amount of revenue has been removed with then brexit debacle .....sending them back is not that easy one they make footfall on British soil , there is a due process , again a massive drain on resources with most getting legal aid which is paid for by donations and the govt.
The more that arrive and who hang around at the tax payers expense claiming bogus asylum is never going to be a good thing
Getting out of the ECHR on the other hand will be a good move sadly some of the day dreamers on this thread fail to see this and its a welcome all attitude in their eyes with no regards of the long term consequences
But as you rightly say the country has enough home grown poncers we don't need foriegn additions
Regards
DF
i think there is a real chance the country will be bankrupted soon , there is too much all round pressure on the economy and a huge amount of revenue has been removed with then brexit debacle .....sending them back is not that easy one they make footfall on British soil , there is a due process , again a massive drain on resources with most getting legal aid which is paid for by donations and the govt.
trouble is , once they get to the UK , what can be done with them ........off shore processing in Ghana , i mean who the **** came upon with that idea...??The more that arrive and who hang around at the tax payers expense claiming bogus asylum is never going to be a good thing
Getting out of the ECHR on the other hand will be a good move sadly some of the day dreamers on this thread fail to see this and its a welcome all attitude in their eyes with no regards of the long term consequences
But as you rightly say the country has enough home grown poncers we don't need foriegn additions
Regards
DF
what about the juxtaposition of racists, all of whom voted for Brexit and get angry about immigrants, where any amount spent on Brexit disaster, be it 200bn 500bn or 1,000bn is all AOK as it's ideological i.e. sovereignty, not economical reasons, but money spent on immigrants even though by comparison is about 0.0001% - outrage ensues
i'm not outraged mate.......i'm concerned , where do you think that money comes from , who pays it back and what is the overall agenda...??
The overall agenda is to distract the public about issues like immigration (because it's emotive), so they are less concerned about real issues like cost of living or government corruption and incompetence.
Why is it the issue of migrant crossings on boats became a hot topic around about the same time Johnson got elected? coincidence or engineered that way?
trouble is , once they get to the UK , what can be done with them ........off shore processing in Ghana , i mean who the **** came upon with that idea...??
nightmare really , there is no solution , it's a 21st century problem .
what about the juxtaposition of racists, all of whom voted for Brexit and get angry about immigrants, where any amount spent on Brexit disaster, be it 200bn 500bn or 1,000bn is all AOK as it's ideological i.e. sovereignty, not economical reasons, but money spent on immigrants even though by comparison is about 0.0001% - outrage ensues
What's racist about saying you're not happy with people making illegal crossings of the English Channel, what a pathetic arguement !
Regards
DF
A government elected to take back control of our borders, needs an Australian to tell them how control the border
You couldn't make it up
Sauce?
Is this a factoid?
Lorries? That's soooo 2017. It's all channel crossings now, darling.
Lorries? That's soooo 2017. It's all channel crossings now, darling.