Welcoming refugees. Well done Brits!

[WATFORD zero]

[MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION]
[MENTION=41385]Randy McNob[/MENTION]
[MENTION=396]WATFORD zero[/MENTION]
[MENTION=37421]daveinplzen[/MENTION]
[MENTION=35904]A1X[/MENTION]

You lot had better keep a low profile on here today. Disgusting people the lot of you.

 

[daveinplzen]

No you are evil for silencing other peoples valid concerns, especially when they understand Islam far more than you do, unlesss you are actually an Islamist yourself covering your cult then you know as much about it as I do.

As somebody who has lived in Saudi Arabia, I seriously doubt if you know more about Islam than I do. Who is 'silencing' you? Nobody.

 

[symyjym]

As somebody who has lived in Saudi Arabia, I seriously doubt if you know more about Islam than I do. Who is 'silencing' you? Nobody.

I hope you enjoyed your Khashoggi kebab

 

[daveinplzen]

I hope you enjoyed your Khashoggi kebab

Yeah, you know much more about Islam than anybody.

 

[daveinplzen]

What a childish response. I bet you got really excited hearing about this latest terror attack.

 

[Is it PotG?]

Don't feel upset GAP, you'll be fine.

 

[symyjym]

Yeah, you know much more about Islam than anybody.

Certainly more than you.

What a childish response. I bet you got really excited hearing about this latest terror attack.

Replace "excited" with "traumatised" and you will closer to the mark, but of course excited fits your Islamic aoplogetic rhetoric.

 

[Randy McNob]

I know alot about football having watched it most of my life.

I conclude all football supporters are hooligans

 

[Is it PotG?]

I know alot about football having watched it most of my life.

I conclude all football supporters are hooligans

Wrong thread.

Should be on the 'letting fans back in' thread.

 

[daveinplzen]

Certainly more than you.



Replace "excited" with "traumatised" and you will closer to the mark, but of course excited fits your Islamic aoplogetic rhetoric.

"traumatised"? What a transparent liar you are.

 

[symyjym]

"traumatised"? What a transparent liar you are.

Most of Europe are traumatised you prick. Don't brutal beheadings traumatise you Just because you have become desensitised to beheadings and accept it, it doesn't mean other people can shrug it off that easily.

 

[Pretty pink fairy]

Most of Europe are traumatised you prick. Don't brutal beheadings traumatise you Just because you have become desensitised to beheadings and accept it, it doesn't mean other people can shrug it off that easily.

He needs to take that HUGE chip off his shoulder
Regards
DF

 

[daveinplzen]

Most of Europe are traumatised you prick. Don't brutal beheadings traumatise you Just because you have become desensitised to beheadings and accept it, it doesn't mean other people can shrug it off that easily.

Yeah,, people are all traumatised. all over Europe. Cant stop and talk about anything here, without somebody revealing how traumatised they are.. I have not been desensitised about beheadings, or accept it. Once again, you return to your 'rhetoric'. Transparent, faux rage. How are you coping with the drone killings of civilians... you must be in a terrible state. Hope you recover.

 

[daveinplzen]

He needs to take that HUGE chip off his shoulder
Regards
DF

You need to get a job.

 

[symyjym]

You need to get a job.

Anti-semite. I've got you

 

[cunning fergus]

Well, knowing how much you hate hypocrisy, I'd be interested to know what NSC's only true socialist makes of a company doing this sort of thing ?

https://schoolsweek.co.uk/96m-laptop-contracts-went-to-tory-donors-firm/

£96m laptop contracts went to Tory donor’s firm

Well, this is a contract to provide laptops to poor children, so I have no difficulty with that objective on the basis the children receiving them are genuinely poor.

If the company has successfully tendered and that tender process is above board, the what exactly is the problem?

I assume the donations made are historical and on the donation register........I am struggling on the face of it to see the problem here, especially with the objective.

Don’t get me wrong I don’t doubt the Tories are in bed with private business that is in their DNA, the Serco award for providing accommodation for economic migrants is a case in point, check out the chairman of Serco.

Further, let’s not forget the whole PFI shitshow, it’s not just the Tories that suck capitalist c**k.

 

[WATFORD zero]

Well, this is a contract to provide laptops to poor children, so I have no difficulty with that objective on the basis the children receiving them are genuinely poor.

If the company has successfully tendered and that tender process is above board, the what exactly is the problem?

I assume the donations made are historical and on the donation register........I am struggling on the face of it to see the problem here, especially with the objective.

Don’t get me wrong I don’t doubt the Tories are in bed with private business that is in their DNA, the Serco award for providing accommodation for economic migrants is a case in point, check out the chairman of Serco.

Further, let’s not forget the whole PFI shitshow, it’s not just the Tories that suck capitalist c**k.

They didn't tender for it, and I agree completely about PFI. This is exactly how companies such as this earn their money through PFI contracts and getting un-tendered contracts as a result of political donations and connections. Personally, I wouldn't have anything to do with such an organisation because of my principles.

Could you imagine what it would feel like for someone with any principles making a living with this sort of organisation ?

 

[cunning fergus]

I'm sure a principled socialist such as yourself would criticise someone working at Computacenter whose owners are major contributors to the Tory party and who get on the back of it government contracts, purely by coincidence of course...

Or is it do as I say, not as I do when you take your bonus on the back of such cronyism?

View attachment 129880

As previous, the objective of the contract is reasonable, so I don’t have a concern with that.......do you?

If there has been a dubious tender process or corruption in the award then that should be subject to parliamentary and criminal scrutiny.......is the article confirming that or suggesting it, I think the latter.

And what are you going on about re bonus you cretin........some of you on this board have quite an unhealthy fixation with my personal stuff, what I wear, where I live, what I do for a living, my upbringing on a council estate etc.

You need to grow up.

 

[cunning fergus]

They didn't tender for it, and I agree completely about PFI. This is exactly how companies such as this earn their money through PFI contracts and getting un-tendered contracts as a result of political donations. Personally, I wouldn't have anything to do with such an organisation because of my principles.

Could you imagine what it would feel like making a living with this sort of organisation ?

Grow up, you don’t know what I do and more importantly it’s none of your business.

I couldn’t give a shit what you do.........so what is with you and others on here with your fixation on what I do or what I wear or where I live?

Seriously, it’s pretty tragic isn’t it?

 

[daveinplzen]

Anti-semite. I've got you

Yes, with a family name of Feiler.
You are correct in one sense. You've got it.