Tyrone Biggums
Well-known member
Lokki 7 said:Does that count for Prince Harry as well then?
I actually think he is Charles son.
I just think Fergie is his mum, the whole ginge thing and all.
Lokki 7 said:Does that count for Prince Harry as well then?
Man of Harveys said:But in terms of PR, wouldn't having a Muslim member of the royal family would be good for them?
Commander said:
Yeah, easier ways to kill someone, but name an easier way to kill someone and make it look like an accident.
Lokki 7 said:I could tell ya, but I'd have to kill ya.
Commander said:In some (unlikely) circumstances they would have. And it would mean that the future King (and head of the Church of England) had a muslim half brother and stepfather.
Yeah, easier ways to kill someone, but name an easier way to kill someone and make it look like an accident.
Tyrone Biggums said:Diana was divorced by then.
I'm pretty sure that would mean any children she bore after the divorce would have no claim to the throne because they wouldn't be of the royal line.
If Charles had an illigitimate child they would be, but not Diana.
As far as i understand the rights to succession its only children of the Heirs to the throne that can lay claim to it.
readingstockport said:Get rid of the sodding lot of them. From the greek/german saxcoburgs to whoever else may want the bloody thing. It's about time we became citizens instead of subjects.
Man of Harveys said:But in terms of PR, wouldn't having a Muslim member of the royal family would be good for them?
Grumpy Sourpuss said:Not really no.
IF she had married him he wouldv'e become the stepfather to the future Head of the Church of England.
Even the Liberals in this country wouldn't have liked that!