Are there any countries who have gone from PR to FPTP?
It's only BANTZ. I bet you're a right laugh on the slash
Unlike others such parties they have no need of PR as a vehicle to enter the mainstream. They are already in it in their province
I'm not sure why that's a bad idea. We had a coalition throughout WW2 and that did a pretty good job.
It was suggested that one of the reasons we ended up with such a bad Brexit deal is that mainland European politicians are brought up on coalitions and, therefore, their entire political lives are spent horse-trading. It means that they're very geared towards compromise. Our politicians, with the winner takes all mentality, aren't used to that amount of give and take, which is why Brexit was so badly handled on this side of the Channel.
Exactly, the only parties in favour of FPTP are the parties whose vote share would be reduced by PR.
I have voted in every election since I was 18, my vote has never meant anything because I live in a safe seat.
FPTP is anti democratic.
They’ve done it in France for decades. I don’t think they have to pay for them.
Is there a way or model to determine the outcome of a GE vote in your constituency if we had PR and if so what was the result?
Exactly, the only parties in favour of FPTP are the parties whose vote share would be reduced by PR.
I have voted in every election since I was 18, my vote has never meant anything because I live in a safe seat.
FPTP is anti democratic.
I wouldn’t want PR. You just end up with coalitions.
As for voter ID... Outside of Tower Hamlets, do we need it?
Absolutely no idea.
My constituency will always return a Tory, I don’t think it has ever been anything else, certainly not since universal suffrage came in.
I would think that if a form of PR came in that it would mean a complete change in the way the whole system is organised.
I’m not holding my breath anyway, I realise that to actually have a proper democracy, is a lot harder than paying lip service to a sham democracy.
Absolutely no idea.
My constituency will always return a Tory, I don’t think it has ever been anything else, certainly not since universal suffrage came in.
I would think that if a form of PR came in that it would mean a complete change in the way the whole system is organised.
I’m not holding my breath anyway, I realise that to actually have a proper democracy, is a lot harder than paying lip service to a sham democracy.
Absolutely no idea.
My constituency will always return a Tory, I don’t think it has ever been anything else, certainly not since universal suffrage came in.
I would think that if a form of PR came in that it would mean a complete change in the way the whole system is organised.
I’m not holding my breath anyway, I realise that to actually have a proper democracy, is a lot harder than paying lip service to a sham democracy.
No, it isn’t. You just disagree with it. There are pros and cons of all systems. PR increases the power of political parties over individual or even local candidates. As such the charge of ‘anti democratic’ can equally be applied to your side of the debate.
a conservative area probably wont ever vote another way. thats not really a problem of FPTP though, certainly not undemocratic if returning a candidate with over 50% of the vote. you're really asking for a complete overhaul of voting system to dispense with local seats. and hopefully deliver parliaments and governments you'd prefer.
i recall there were studies on AV and STV systems at time of the referendum. changed a couple of governments over the decades, not nearly as much as people think.
East Worthing
a conservative area probably wont ever vote another way. thats not really a problem of FPTP though, certainly not undemocratic if returning a candidate with over 50% of the vote. you're really asking for a complete overhaul of voting system to dispense with local seats. and hopefully deliver parliaments and governments you'd prefer.
i recall there were studies on AV and STV systems at time of the referendum. changed a couple of governments over the decades, not nearly as much as people think.
With voter I D set to be introduced from 2023 do NSCers feel this a good thing or a bad thing?
For the record I think it will be a good thing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
2019 election all the other parties combined didn’t surpass Loughton’s vote, I’m not certain that’s the fault of FPTP,
2017 a different matter, the rest combined circa 1000 votes more
2015 again Loughton polled way more than all the others combined
I think your challenge is you live in an area where a clear majority are polar opposite to your political views, now if that really is a problem for you you need to move [emoji23]
I’m just asking that my vote, a right that people have died for, and are still dying for in other countries, should actually mean something nationally.
I’m not clever enough to design a system that could make every vote in an election count, or be seen to count, but, there have to be a more democratic way than FPTP. Only 66% of voters actually voted in the 2019 , possibly the most important election in a generation, and how much of that relatively low turnout for the importance of the election, was down to voter apathy caused by knowing that only about 5% if that,of those votes cast could actually change anything.
Even the cheerleaders for FPTP must realise that something is seriously wrong when 43% of 66% can lead to an 80 seat majority. I suppose that the Conservatives and Labour aren’t going to rock the boat, because they are the only 2 parties who have sufficient Parliamentary votes to change the system, a system gifted to them by dint of a rigged process.
Whatever it is, it ain’t a proper democracy.