hart's shirt
Well-known member
Over to Banksy...
I don't think it's an original. It looks like a poorly photoshopped version of Banksy's Love Sick.
Whoever's done it has forgotten to remove some of the hearts at the bottom.
Over to Banksy...
I'm fairly certain Chuka Umanna (purple tie) has not defected to UKIP and will continue to sit as the Labour MP for Streatham after the General Election.
No, he hasnt, he is labour., The Shadow Business Secretary in fact. Maybe UKIP supporters think tie colour is crucial to the election.
Quite looking forward to the election. Will be surprised if the wankers retain both the seats they have.
"White Britons"??
And another UKIP candidate recently on Question Time.
No, ill leave that to UKIP people Bashlsdir. Im quite happy at pointing, and laughing at UKIP thanks.
They are under 'constant' attacks for good reasons mate. They keep opening their mouths. You know that. I know that. The vast majority of the electorate know that.
If we left Europe then it would be up to our neighbours to choose whether to trade with one of the worlds richest countries or not, if we manufacture 'widgets' and offer world class services at a competitive price then why wouldnt they, similarly I am sure they would wish to have access to a market worth ££ billions and 60+ million people, that what trade is all about ?
Nigel Farage on Absolute Radio, seems perfectly normal to me.
. We import more from the EU than we export to them
The problem is we don't manufacture very much, and we consume a lot.
Mustafa seems to be confusing what he hopes is the case (that 'we left wing majority' will see off UKIP) and reality. It seems clear to me that Farage is on to a complete winner by simplifying all the things that annoy us into a seductive mantra (referendum, leave Europe, regain control, the rest will fix itself). Everyone can see that 'Europe' (the empire of the commissions and the European parliament) is flabby, unaccountable, and riven by nation-based factions. The reality is that UKIP, provided they don't machine gun themselves in the foot, will do well. There is always a risk one of their leaders will be caught on camera sneering at p***s, n*******, P****, etc, but it will take a relentless stream of gaffs to undermine their credibility with those who wish to vote for them now. Something else not widely recognised is that for some voting UKIP will be a guilty pleasure, a bit of risk taking fun, cocking a snook etc.
No, Mustafa. I am not fooled by UKIP, and will vote the way I always do, but I don't imagine for a moment that I am part of a left wing majority. Don't be complacent. The opponents of UKIP have so far failed to come up with anything that remotely resembles a coherent argument against them. There is one, but nobody has mentioned it. It goes thus:
After the last war, folk recognised that when one European nation (let's face it, the Germans) get a bit above themselves and start pinching the neighbour's land and mistreating its minorities (back then it was the Jews - remember them?), and we have an inevitable war (they used to be inevitable and regular) then it makes no sense to grind the faces of the vanquished because they will only grow stronger and come back even more determined next time (vide: WWI, reparations, rise of Hitler, WWII). Better to make Europe stable by 'coming together'. And at the time we had the Red Menace (a real one - Joe Stalin) breathing at us from points east. So 'Europe' was born. Arguably it has helped keep the peace - and ensure that only peace is on the horizon, within the Euro tent - forever after. On the downside it has ballooned into a mess with the commissions and the interference in sovereign issues. That said, its only the Brits that really think that. The rest of 'Europe' are pretty relaxed about it all. Nevertheless, that doesn't mean the Brits are wrong. Despite being in favour of 'Europe' (for the reasons outlined) it seems obvious to me that when a system fails Tony Benn's rules of democrasy then it has to be fixed (this includes the ability to vote out the rulers - we cannot do that with the commisioners).
So the rise of UKIP mirrors repeated governments' failure to tackle the root problems of Europe - failure to suppress the growth of commission power, and failure to insist on transparency. But when you consider that Thatcher was completely against transparency (remember her fave Lord Chief Justice Denning and his opposition to Enquiries?) and only interested in 'gettting back' our 'unfair contribution', while Labour wanted no scrutiny or criticism of 'Europe' largely to distinguish themselves from 'madame non', you can appreciate that we have sat back and done nothing useful to bring a bit of 'British Common Sense' to the party. Our mainstream parties have just used European issues to further their own electoral position, with no actual reflection or engagement, or even proper analysis of 'Europe'. We have sat back and let UKIP walk into the party, and now our mainstream parties (who have disengaged from being proactive over 'European' issues) have no way of laying a single punch on their imperative. A disgrace, actually. Shame on Labour, Liberals and the Conservatives.
So it is the fault of the maistream politics that UKIP has risen. This is exactly the same as our (dis)engagement with UEFA and FIFA. Apparently the FA never bothered to send anyone to meetings and treated our European football authority in particular with disdain. The cosnequence is we have no influence, meaning that FIFA is run by a lunatic, and only lunatics have a chance to be elected as UEFA president (Platini etc - the pillock). To me this means that if you disengage then you lose influence. Just like 'Europe'. in football some of us think it would be better if we not try to go to the world cup, etc . . . the football equivalent of the UKIP ideal. A good idea? Sadly it is a bit late now to flounce off. UKIP are the political equivalent of the football founcers, who would rather us just have 'home championships' every spring and to hell with the rest of the buggers.
The one way to oppose UKIP is to challenge their bogus vision of a UK out of Europe, trading freely again with the old empire (Australia, NZ, SA). Yes it works for Switzerlan and Sweden to be semi detached from Europe, but they have their reasons, and in the case of Sweden, who cares? It is quite different for UK to go marching off. We are supposed to be one of the big 3 in Europe (along with France and Germany). In what way does it serve our interests to behave more like Greece or Italy, threatening to disengage? The French and Germans think we are mad and destructive to threaten to 'leave' and, unlike with Switzerland, they will punish us if we do. OK, so having to spend 2 hours going through customs when taking the chunnel of ferry to France, or the Freddy Laker to Faro, like we do when we travel to the US or Israel, might be a small price to pay for our 'freedom'. But what worries me is that like some have said on here, 'Europe' will probably collapse in 20 years. Then, who knows? War? I'd rather be inside the tent where I have some influence than out.
Actually, after all that, the arguments in favour of staying 'in' seem rather weak. Lol! Someone bail me out with some reasoned logic or I might just vote UKIP after all.
Business men want the EU...so its pretty much a given.
Business men quite like the status quo if they are currently succeeding, I cannot see a reason why imminent failure awaits if we withdrew, but ultimately just because a basket of businesses prefer we stay in whilst the British taxpayer pays billions out without a referendum or reasonable debate then it shouldnt invalidate a view that we should leave it.
That may well be the case thats why I mentioned services, but how does Europe effect that.
If we consume alot then Europe would want to continue free trade with us and therefore vice versa, or are you expecting an economic downturn and hope that some other succeeding European country to bail us out.
Paul Drayson donated £100,000 to Labour and subsequently his company was awarded a £32million contract to supply a smallpox vaccine.