bobbysmith01
Well-known member
- Feb 6, 2015
- 806
Controversial I know, but I think it's a logical decision based on:
1. Who else would take it?
2. They only need a couple of wins and draws
3. He knows the club
4. He is capable of getting some points with his style of boring football.
5. He is available
6. No compensation to be paid
7. And I Win money on 4-1 bet
8. It's give us a laugh at their expense.
They will be fine, they somehow always are. Parish Is the problem at Palace, no idea on how to run a club and according to Simon Jordan, takes a £3 million a year salary and taken more out of Palace than put in. My Palace mate told me once he rather have Parish than Bloom?
1. Who else would take it?
2. They only need a couple of wins and draws
3. He knows the club
4. He is capable of getting some points with his style of boring football.
5. He is available
6. No compensation to be paid
7. And I Win money on 4-1 bet
8. It's give us a laugh at their expense.
They will be fine, they somehow always are. Parish Is the problem at Palace, no idea on how to run a club and according to Simon Jordan, takes a £3 million a year salary and taken more out of Palace than put in. My Palace mate told me once he rather have Parish than Bloom?