beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,025
I'm not a Tory apologist (Boris and his party need removing as soon as possible), but this one doesn't feel like one that should be pushed. I did a bit of reading around it, and from what I found it's a very problematic headline that hides a lot of detail. Within that detail, it turns out that while it's *possible* Sunak could have acted differently and saved us £11bn, the reality is that the circumstances to make that happen were not exactly straight forward and the level of risk that taking the proposed approach would have entailed could probably have been described as "irresponsible to pursue".
There's plenty for us to attack the Tories over, but this one feels like a dangerous one as it's easily defended.
as i read it, the £11bn claim assumes government could have refinanced £600bn of debt in six months. it's a theoretical saving and overlooks the economic and political sensitives (loss of independance of BoE in the process). no other country is follow a similar policy of refinancing all their debt as suggested.