Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,366
I would say that his injury record wasn't particularly out of the ordinary until the hamstring and that Leeds' points return without him almost halved. They didn't keep a single clean sheet in the league without him last season and conceded three or more in eight of the fourteen games he missed. They kept five clean sheets in the twenty four games he played and conceded three goals or more in five of those.
Had his defensive presence meant them maintaining the just under 1 point a game that they managed with him in the side, they would have finished level on points with Everton. When he got injured, their goal difference was seven better than Everton's. In the games that followed Everton's went from -18 to -23, whilst Leeds's went from -11 to -30. The heavy defeats that caused this were not just against the top sides. They let in 4 at Bournemouth and 5 at home to Palace.
I'm not sure any of this says that he's the one for us, but it certainly seems to suggest that Leeds should fight to keep him.
Had his defensive presence meant them maintaining the just under 1 point a game that they managed with him in the side, they would have finished level on points with Everton. When he got injured, their goal difference was seven better than Everton's. In the games that followed Everton's went from -18 to -23, whilst Leeds's went from -11 to -30. The heavy defeats that caused this were not just against the top sides. They let in 4 at Bournemouth and 5 at home to Palace.
I'm not sure any of this says that he's the one for us, but it certainly seems to suggest that Leeds should fight to keep him.