[Politics] Trump's new gender executive order...

[BadFish]

It's like NSC, with more hormones.

Stronger pelvic floors though.

 

[BadFish]

No.

This is condescending nonsense:



A radical man hating women looking at rape statistics for crimes committed by females. She states that women can’t participate in rape because they don’t have a penis and heavily implies that it’s trans-men committing these crimes without any evidence at all.

These are the sort of academics that were cancelled on campuses for this nonsense. This enabled the Tories and the right to hoist the ‘cancellation’ and ‘anti-woke’ agendas and use these cases to back up their nonsense knowing full well their target audience would not be capable of tracing the back stories to all of this.

My point is, who actually gives a shit? Why have we been told all this is such a problem by the right wing media and politicians? The biggest stat in any of this is the suicide rates of trans people, I think this is being affected by the right wing media spotlight on their community.

The vast, vast majority of trans people are not nutty trans activists or sex offenders. The vast, vast majority of lesbians are not man hating radical feminists banned from Pride marches. Why do these two tiny niche groups have the ability to steer the narrative?

The people who control what YOU think need YOU to get upset about ‘woke’, because they need you to vote for them and consume their media in order to make them richer and more powerful.

I can't 'this' this enough. 30p lee said the last bit out loud before the last election but still people are triggered by this shit like Pavlov's dogs.


. . . . And the thread will return to discussion of toilets and changing rooms just like they want.

Anda trans people are stuck with the unwanted role of political catalyst to mobilise the braying masses into a populist folly.

 

[Eeyore]

Don't be silly.

I am thinking specifically about things like medicines.
We hear a lot about 'personalized' medicine.
(interventions tailored to our genotype)
And yet we can't even be bothered to select a dose around body weight for most drugs.
I have never understood that.

Likewise I know colleagues who have made a career around the effect of biological sex on drug actions.
But almost all drugs are prescribed without any regard for the sex of the patient.

As for voter fitness, yes I do believe certain categories of people should be excluded from voting.
But don't worry. I don't mean silly old sausages like you.
I mean people who in a test would declare:

England won world war two against France and America
Women are inferior
The square root of 100 is 2
Scotland is part of England
It is OK to kill people if they disagree with you.

(Other more considered questions are available.)

And so on. A simple little fitness test. What's not to like?

By that criteria, some of the MPs could be elected despite not being able to vote themselves