Trump

[nicko31]

Trump's majority now on a knife edge, gonna get harder for him to get things done. Then there's the mid term elections.

 

[Mellotron]

I know it's just an exit poll, but still kind of tough to call it wrong with numbers like that.

View attachment 91945

To confirm, tribalism has gotten us to the point where people will vote (in big numbers) for a SUSPECTED PAEDOPHILE BECAUSE HE IS WEARING THE RIGHT COLOUR TIE.

That's where we're at, everyone.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

To confirm, tribalism has gotten us to the point where people will vote (in big numbers) for a SUSPECTED PAEDOPHILE BECAUSE HE IS WEARING THE RIGHT COLOUR TIE.

That's where we're at, everyone.

Yes. There is now pretty much no form of bad or criminal behaviour which cannot be overlooked if there is enough Fake News and Whataboutism injected into the reality.

 

[Greg Bobkin]

False teeth, surely?

Hashtag FAKE TEETH

He'll be annoyed fellow sex pest Roy Moore lost that hot bed of liberal pinkos Alabama.

This interview is hilarious.

[tweet]940704581742419969[/tweet]

What a Crock(ett) of shite!

 

[Frutos]

He'll be annoyed fellow sex pest Roy Moore lost that hot bed of liberal pinkos Alabama.

This interview is hilarious.

[tweet]940704581742419969[/tweet]

[emoji38]

As Rowan Atkinson put it in Blackadder II "the eyes are open, the mouth moves, but Mr Brain has long since departed".

 

[Fungus]

Did anyone else notice Trump's announcement of a new Moon mission? Just more deflection? It didn't make quite the same impact as Kennedy's speech, way back when.

During a signing ceremony, Mr Trump said: "We are the leader and we're going to stay the leader, and we're going to increase it many fold." Anyone understand the final part of that?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42322236

 

[Stat Brother]

To confirm, tribalism has gotten us to the point where people will vote (in big numbers) for a SUSPECTED PAEDOPHILE BECAUSE HE IS WEARING THE RIGHT COLOUR TIE.

That's where we're at, everyone.

I'm reminded of an Alan B'stard quote, from The New Statesman, when talking to his Tory fallguy and elected representative from Henley (?)

'Henley, Henley, stick a blue rosette of a hatstand and they'll vote it into parliament'.

I'll hazard a guess anybody, literally anybody (white), would get a decent turn out from Alabama if they were Republican, stood in front of the flag and went to church.

 

[Lyndhurst 14]

Unusual for the New York tabloids to publish a cover like that - guess they didn't like him

 

[The_Viper]

I don't really know anything about either of these candidates other than what I have read about him being a pedo.

Can someone explain to me how a Paedophile is allowed to run? How is he not in jail? I am so confused as to how this has even taken place.

 

[Stat Brother]

I don't really know anything about either of these candidates other than what I have read about him being a pedo.

Can someone explain to me how a Paedophile is allowed to run? How is he not in jail? I am so confused as to how this has even taken place.

Because Roy Moore has/had a liking for younger girls when he was in his 30's, dating, spending time with, and inappropriate touching them, he seemed to lose interest when they went off to college.
I'm sure there's plenty more, which others are probably currently writing.

His candidacy seems to stem from 'the swamp'.
It's fake news/Washington telling the good people of Alabama what they can and can't do, who they can or can't elect to represent them.
That's a pretty strong message to send out to the voting Republican's, and as said earlier, under these circumstances they would vote for anybody.

The difference between Moore and Trump, is that everybody else voted as well, which is why one got elected and the other didn't.

 

[Mellotron]

The difference between Moore and Trump, is that everybody else voted as well, which is why one got elected and the other didn't.

Also perhaps Moore wasn't against up against one of the worst candidates in history.

 

[Behind Enemy Lines]

Also perhaps Moore wasn't against up against one of the worst candidates in history.

That is the 64000 dollar question isn't it: who will the Democrats choose in 2020. There's no obvious stand-out candidate but whoever emerges they must do two things: Firstly, as Joan C Williams says they must appeal to white "working class" voters which Bill did but Hilary Clinton couldn't. And whoever they choose, unlike 2016, the whole party must unite and get behind the candidate. If they don't, Trump might win again.

 

[Stat Brother]

That is the 64000 dollar question isn't it: who will the Democrats choose in 2020. There's no obvious stand-out candidate but whoever emerges they must do two things: Firstly, as Joan C Williams says they must appeal to white "working class" voters which Bill did but Hilary Clinton couldn't. And whoever they choose, unlike 2016, the whole party must unite and get behind the candidate. If they don't, Trump might win again.

Chelsea Clinton?

 

[Mellotron]

That is the 64000 dollar question isn't it: who will the Democrats choose in 2020. There's no obvious stand-out candidate but whoever emerges they must do two things: Firstly, as Joan C Williams says they must appeal to white "working class" voters which Bill did but Hilary Clinton couldn't. And whoever they choose, unlike 2016, the whole party must unite and get behind the candidate. If they don't, Trump might win again.

Hasn't Joe Biden intimated that he would stand?

 

[Mellotron]

The others I'm reading about with the most buzz are Elizabeth Warren and Deval Patrick.

 

[bhafc99]

That is the 64000 dollar question isn't it: who will the Democrats choose in 2020. There's no obvious stand-out candidate but whoever emerges they must do two things: Firstly, as Joan C Williams says they must appeal to white "working class" voters which Bill did but Hilary Clinton couldn't. And whoever they choose, unlike 2016, the whole party must unite and get behind the candidate. If they don't, Trump might win again.

Elizabeth Warren? Though she needs to answer the whole "Native American while at Harvard" thing better...

 

[Stat Brother]

Also perhaps Moore wasn't against up against one of the worst candidates in history.

True they were the only possible candidates the other could have lost too.

 

[Papa Lazarou]

Elizabeth Warren? Though she needs to answer the whole "Native American while at Harvard" thing better...

Pocahontas?

 

[The_Viper]

Because Roy Moore has/had a liking for younger girls when he was in his 30's, dating, spending time with, and inappropriate touching them, he seemed to lose interest when they went off to college.
I'm sure there's plenty more, which others are probably currently writing.

His candidacy seems to stem from 'the swamp'.
It's fake news/Washington telling the good people of Alabama what they can and can't do, who they can or can't elect to represent them.
That's a pretty strong message to send out to the voting Republican's, and as said earlier, under these circumstances they would vote for anybody.

The difference between Moore and Trump, is that everybody else voted as well, which is why one got elected and the other didn't.

That doesn't answer my question. If he is a pedophile, how is he not in jail?

 

[Stat Brother]

That doesn't answer my question. If he is a pedophile, how is he not in jail?

I don't know the age of consent in Alabama or the age of his accusers at the time of their acquaintances.
Google is your friend, my friend.

Perhaps you already know the answer?