Why does civil unrest over issues like this always result in looting? What the hell has stealing from shops ( ruining the livelihoods of innocent people ) got to do with street protests? It just seems that it is the perfect cover for those predisposed to break the law to help themselves. In 2011, protests over the shooting of Mark Duggan in Tottenham, ended up with rioting and looting on a national basis. The vast majority got away with it. When law and order breaks down, you have to take strong measures. In many cases in 2011, police in the UK stood back and did nothing, whilst businesses were being burned to the ground and millions stolen. Simply unacceptable. Outside of using live ammunition, any measure should be employed to ensure safety on our streets. I don't care, as long as the scum who take advantage of these situations are rounded up and punished. Its us, the taxpayer, who bears the cost of this. In 2011, in London alone, it was estimated that 30,000 trading hours were lost at a cost of £100m.
I wouldn't usually but I'm going to defend the Met Police on the Mark Duggan riots. It's a valid tactic to let a riot burn itself out - it allows officers to stay safe and more importantly it prevents police action invoking an escalation. Bit like a forest fire - ring it, fight it from the edges but let it burn itself out. Then after deal with the cause. In those riots emergency courts were set up and people were arrested and convicted within hours. I read a report of a girl who had accepted a pair of looted trainers - arrested, convicted and sentenced to six months. We now have the tech to get people after the event. Obviously te USA police are rather different beasts !