Gritt23
New member
So shouldn't be in the Trump thread then.
Maybe better in the 'heavily armed Israeli soldiers killing unarmed Palestinians" thread.
What do you think has triggered these events?
So shouldn't be in the Trump thread then.
Maybe better in the 'heavily armed Israeli soldiers killing unarmed Palestinians" thread.
So shouldn't be in the Trump thread then.
Maybe better in the 'heavily armed Israeli soldiers killing unarmed Palestinians" thread.
What do you think has triggered these events?
Triggered by Trump moving the US embassy specifically against worldwide policy towards Israel and the Middle east.
The events that have been going on since the 1948 Arab Israeli War?
I'd say the 7th century Arab conquests kicked it all off initially.
All of the Israeli Government are located there. Seems the most logical place to have an embassy.
Wouldn't a US embassy be better served in London than Brighton?
All of the Israeli Government are located there. Seems the most logical place to have an embassy.
Wouldn't a US embassy be better served in London than Brighton?
Ah, convenient. I was asking more specifically, and I think you knew that, you cheeky little scamp.
Israeli forces fired live ammunition at unarmed Palestinians demonstrating for the right to return to the homes from which they were violently expelled from in 1948.
Not if London is disputed land ( or more accurately, stolen land ).
"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
today there is no difference between Jordanians,
Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian
people' to oppose Zionism.
Some would argue that you are right about that. Apparently in the 92 election, Clinton promised his administration would support Jerusalem as the capital. Once elected he never followed through, In 1995, Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act, which declared that "Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel." The bill also stated that the American embassy should move to Jerusalem within five years. Backing the legislation was viewed by some as reflecting American domestic politics. Clinton opposed the Jerusalem Embassy Act and signed a waiver every six month delaying the move. Bush never followed through either and Barry O in 2008, the day after getting the Democratic Presidential nomination, said in his first foreign policy speech that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." However, he backtracked almost immediately.
All Trump did was action what previous Presidents had promised. Now, in the light of whats going on in the Middle East, is it good timing? Further discussion methinks.
It's the very reason why this will go on for a long time yet.
So the massive increase in violence over the last 48 hrs, can you think of anything that may have triggered it?
Reacting to the opening of the United States embassy in Jerusalem, Raed Jarrar, Advocacy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International USA stated:
“Today, on the eve of Palestinians’ commemoration of the Nakba, the displacement and dispossession of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians 70 years ago from their homes and towns, the United States has chosen to reward the illegal annexation of occupied territory by moving its embassy and recognizing unified Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.
“The Trump administration may portray this action as simply hauling desks from one building to another. But in reality this move intentionally undermines Palestinian rights and in effect condones decades of violations by Israel, including the creation of illegal settlements, which constitute war crimes.
“This U.S. action comes in the midst of a brutal crackdown by the Israeli government against Palestinians in Gaza who have been protesting, in the vicinity of the Israel-Gaza fence, against their unbearable living conditions and calling for the right to return. Israeli soldiers have used weapons — some made in the U.S. and designed to cause maximum harm — against individuals who were not posing an imminent threat to them, injuring thousands, and killing 37, including some in what appear to have been willful killings.
“As Israel’s main supplier of military equipment and technology, the U.S. must finally realize that it is fueling serious human rights abuses and consistently allowing Israeli authorities to remain unaccountable for their actions.
“Rather than showing contempt for international law yet again, the U.S. must take concrete steps to stop the delivery of arms and military equipment to Israel, and demand independent, impartial investigations into reports of violations.”
Responding to reports that dozens of Palestinians have already been killed and hundreds injured by the Israeli military, Philip Luther, Research and Advocacy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International, said:
“This is another horrific example of the Israeli military using excessive force and live ammunition in a totally deplorable way. This is a violation of international standards, in some instances committing what appear to be wilful killings constituting war crimes.
“Today’s footage from Gaza is extremely troubling, and as violence continues to spiral out of control, the Israeli authorities must immediately rein in the military to prevent the further loss of life and serious injuries.
“Only last month, Amnesty International called on the international community to stop the delivery of arms and military equipment to Israel. The rising toll of deaths and injuries today only serves to highlight the urgent need for an arms embargo.
“While some protestors may have engaged in some form of violence, this still does not justify the use of live ammunition.
“Under international law, firearms can only be used to protect against an imminent threat of death or serious injury.”
Early medical reports from Gaza today indicate that dozens of people have been shot in the head or chest. Amnesty International last month documented research from the Gaza Strip that showed the Israeli military were killing and maiming demonstrators who pose no imminent threat to them.
100,000 or 3 Amex crowds worth of Palestinians were displaced in 1948, and now the figures are more than 4.3 million classed as Palestinian refugees?
I don't see the displaced Greek Cypriots trying to attack North Cyprus. They moved on and built their new and successful lives in the South. If the Palestinians invested in themselves instead of the destruction of Israel they would have a country to be proud of.