BrianWade4
Well-known member
Lovely stuff. Cheers
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Lovely stuff. Cheers
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28623680
just goes to show that we aren't the only club expecting to sign players close to the first match
just goes to show that we aren't the only club expecting to sign players close to the first match
gripper stebson
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 6,691
Rhys Withenshaw @Rev_RWithenshaw 51m
I'd hate to sell Sam Baldock, but £4M?
We can't turn that down, it'd be madness.
Ryan Whitmarsh• @19Ryan92 3m
£4 million for Sam Baldock? Take it and sign Agard for £600k and I wont be complaining.
News around the place on Twitter that we have agreed 4M for Baldock!!!
I expect this is mindless optimism on the part of the BCFC fans.
I'd hate to sell Sam Baldock, but £4M?
We can't turn that down, it'd be madness.
Ryan Whitmarsh• @19Ryan92 3m
£4 million for Sam Baldock? Take it and sign Agard for £600k and I wont be complaining.
News around the place on Twitter that we have agreed 4M for Baldock!!!
I expect this is mindless optimism on the part of the BCFC fans.
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
- Jan 7, 2006
- 15,306
Suspect it's crossed wires, fee would actually be £1.4million
The_Viper
Well-known member
If it's 4 million we will be a laughing stock. Bloom isn't one to allow anyone the last laugh. Definitely not 4 million.
Brighton Boy
New member
4 million for Baldock would be insane in my opinion and would also confirm that he would be Ulloas replacement. I'd highly doubt we would sign him for 4 million then spend something similar for Ulloas replacement.
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
There's no way we will pay £4 million for Baldock. Bristol City fans can talk about how he wants to stay and they don't need to sell all they want but the fact is, with a year left on his contract, the power is in Baldock's hands. If he wants to stay, he will sign a new contract. If he wants to come to Brighton we will get him and for a sensible price. Bristol City won't want to lose their main asset on a free transfer next summer and won't want to risk having a player who wanted to move on their books. Either way, we won't pay £4 million.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
4 million ?
Yes, for Vossen, or Soriano, or even Becchio.
But Baldock ? We should check in for a psychiatric assessment if we pay that much for him.
Yes, for Vossen, or Soriano, or even Becchio.
But Baldock ? We should check in for a psychiatric assessment if we pay that much for him.
Would you pay £2m upfront then another £2m provided he scored over 20 goals, we got promoted to the Premier League and he played than 40 times this season? Hopefully the bulk of any fee is tied up in performance-appearance criteria.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Personally I wouldn't go above 1.5 million total, but 20+ goals and promotion would realistically mean we'd be able to pay a top up.
fat old seagull
New member
Leo went to leicester, though he loved it at Brighton...because it was a good career move for him. It will be the same for Sam. 
mona
The Glory Game
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooof.
Hot air.
Hot air.
Finchley Seagull
Well-known member
Out of interest, why did you give me a thumbs down for saying we won't pay £4 million for Baldock?
greyseagull
New member
Leo went to leicester, though he loved it at Brighton...because it was a good career move for him. It will be the same for Sam.
I actually read that as if it was a new chant
KJP
Well-known member
Haha it has the makings of a chant though, Leo went to Leicester actually fits quite well in my old mans a dustman
Mr Smggles
Well-known member
Aww baby boy, don't cry about your thumbs down.
fat old seagull
New member
You're right of course, I've amended it......
Leo went to leicester 
though he loved it at Brighton.
..because it was a good career move for him.
and now we've got the money, so we don't give a damn. 
and it will be the same for Sam 