[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,389
The 'they're all the same' defence. It's at least a couple of pages since we've had that :lolol:
Not a defence at all, completely the reverse. I despair how lies and spin (essentially the same thing in practice) have become imbedded in politics and are now largely considered normal. I despise Johnson for his lies, arrogance and his total lack of interest in the welfare of the country and its people rather than his own career. However, I don't have much more confidence in anyone in the Westminster sewer. That's not a defence, but an opinion I hold and I wish I had cause to feel differently.
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
Whether he did or didn't lie is now really irrelevant in terms of his career (that's not to say he shouldn't be held to account) as a politician in that he has completely and permanently lost the trust of the people he was supposed to represent. The fact that he and his supporters believe there is a way back starkly demonstrates how some, if not all, Westminster politicians have completely lost any understanding of the importance of being trusted by the electorate and how this requires honesty as a pre requisite. Its astonishing and depressing. The belief that lying is an essential part of successful politics started with the spin of Mandelson and the lying by Blair over Iraq, continued with Brexit (on both sides) and has culminated in a whole government that simply cannot tell the difference between truth and lies. Regardless of one's views on their policies or beliefs, I don't think anyone doubted the essential honesty of people like Thatcher, Kinnock or Major. I see precious few anywhere in Westminster that I can say the same for. If people cant believe the words of our leaders or potential leaders, why bother to vote?
starmer?
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,772
Not a defence at all, completely the reverse. I despair how lies and spin (essentially the same thing in practice) have become imbedded in politics and are now largely considered normal. I despise Johnson for his lies, arrogance and his total lack of interest in the welfare of the country and its people rather than his own career. However, I don't have much more confidence in anyone in the Westminster sewer. That's not a defence, but an opinion I hold and I wish I had cause to feel differently.
You seem to have gone straight from 1 to 3 bypassing 2 completely

The Johnson cabal supporters are still here, even if those particular accounts aren't.

Just look out for the "They're all the same", "Why isn't Starmer doing more", "I don't support this Government, but" posts from the more recent NSC joiners :wink:

(I don't really think you are one of these new accounts from the Johnson cabal :wink:)
 
Last edited:




Flagship

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2018
424
Brighton
so you are moderate. what sanction would a moderate impose on someone for posting,

"plough them all into a fuckin ditch",

just so as i know the difference between right and wrong, like
I expect you know the difference. I'm not a moderator so perhaps you should ask one.
All I would say is that sort of stuff is unnecessary and people should be able to get their point across without resorting to vitriol.
 




nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,574
Gods country fortnightly
Well bugger me backwards, Johnson lied to the Privileges Committee

Boris Johnson claimed No 10 drinks party was for official who didn’t leave until month later​


Boris Johnson has been urged to correct his Partygate inquiry testimony after he was found to have claimed a No 10 party marked the exit of the top civil servant who did not resign until a month later. The former Tory prime minister claimed the notorious “bring your own booze” garden party on 20 May 2020 had been aimed at motivating staff because cabinet secretary Mark Sedwill had quit. But Mr Sedwill did not resign until 29 June 2020 – more than a month later.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-partygate-inquiry-drinks-b2306473.html

I'm sure nobody expected that :lolol:
7 years for perjury isn't ?
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Whether he did or didn't lie is now really irrelevant in terms of his career (that's not to say he shouldn't be held to account) as a politician in that he has completely and permanently lost the trust of the people he was supposed to represent. The fact that he and his supporters believe there is a way back starkly demonstrates how some, if not all, Westminster politicians have completely lost any understanding of the importance of being trusted by the electorate and how this requires honesty as a pre requisite. Its astonishing and depressing. The belief that lying is an essential part of successful politics started with the spin of Mandelson and the lying by Blair over Iraq, continued with Brexit (on both sides) and has culminated in a whole government that simply cannot tell the difference between truth and lies. Regardless of one's views on their policies or beliefs, I don't think anyone doubted the essential honesty of people like Thatcher, Kinnock or Major. I see precious few anywhere in Westminster that I can say the same for. If people cant believe the words of our leaders or potential leaders, why bother to vote?
If you believe that lying and spin started with Mandelson, then I have some beans to sell you.
 






rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,202
I expect you know the difference. I'm not a moderator so perhaps you should ask one.
All I would say is that sort of stuff is unnecessary and people should be able to get their point across without resorting to vitriol.
you were judging the moderator, so i wrongly assumed that you thought you could do better, my mistake, soz.

it's humour, have you lived in england long?

"plough them all into a f***ing ditch", clampy informs me that the english have been saying this for centuries, but today, you are too snowflaky to see the humour. i thought you right wing johnies were champions of free speech? i got that wrong as well.

(i don't think anyone has actually been ploughed into any ditch, (and if they were, they almost certainly deserved it))
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
She's leaving anyway.

Let her carry on doing damage.
Leaving the Commons. She's still holding out for her peerage in the House of Lords, with a vote and £350 a day for checking in.

Get her out.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,259
Cumbria
Well bugger me backwards, Johnson lied to the Privileges Committee

Boris Johnson claimed No 10 drinks party was for official who didn’t leave until month later​


Boris Johnson has been urged to correct his Partygate inquiry testimony after he was found to have claimed a No 10 party marked the exit of the top civil servant who did not resign until a month later. The former Tory prime minister claimed the notorious “bring your own booze” garden party on 20 May 2020 had been aimed at motivating staff because cabinet secretary Mark Sedwill had quit. But Mr Sedwill did not resign until 29 June 2020 – more than a month later.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-partygate-inquiry-drinks-b2306473.html

I'm sure nobody expected that :lolol:
Ah - but it was presumably in 'good faith'. And what you need to understand is that they had all been working very hard.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,574
Gods country fortnightly
She's leaving anyway.

Let her carry on doing damage.
I don't see why she should be allowed to continue undermining our democracy. I don't care what party she is in, if you undermine parliamentary scrutiny committees you are in contempt of parliament. Speaker needs to act...

There's also Ofcom too....
 




Peteinblack

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jun 3, 2004
4,135
Bath, Somerset.
Well bugger me backwards, Johnson lied to the Privileges Committee

Boris Johnson claimed No 10 drinks party was for official who didn’t leave until month later​


Boris Johnson has been urged to correct his Partygate inquiry testimony after he was found to have claimed a No 10 party marked the exit of the top civil servant who did not resign until a month later. The former Tory prime minister claimed the notorious “bring your own booze” garden party on 20 May 2020 had been aimed at motivating staff because cabinet secretary Mark Sedwill had quit. But Mr Sedwill did not resign until 29 June 2020 – more than a month later.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-partygate-inquiry-drinks-b2306473.html

I'm sure nobody expected that :lolol:
I bet he lied "hand on heart" :shrug:
 


Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,773
Fiveways
Whether he did or didn't lie is now really irrelevant in terms of his career (that's not to say he shouldn't be held to account) as a politician in that he has completely and permanently lost the trust of the people he was supposed to represent. The fact that he and his supporters believe there is a way back starkly demonstrates how some, if not all, Westminster politicians have completely lost any understanding of the importance of being trusted by the electorate and how this requires honesty as a pre requisite. Its astonishing and depressing. The belief that lying is an essential part of successful politics started with the spin of Mandelson and the lying by Blair over Iraq, continued with Brexit (on both sides) and has culminated in a whole government that simply cannot tell the difference between truth and lies. Regardless of one's views on their policies or beliefs, I don't think anyone doubted the essential honesty of people like Thatcher, Kinnock or Major. I see precious few anywhere in Westminster that I can say the same for. If people cant believe the words of our leaders or potential leaders, why bother to vote?
This is a false equivalence. A couple of points on this:
1, Blair didn't lie about Iraq. He believed the intelligence. Whether he should have done, or not, is an entirely different question. He still speaks about this, have a listen to Gordon Correra's series currently airing on R4.
2, the New Labour spin that you're referring to was what they regarded to be a necessary response to the 'feral beast' that is the UK press, which is fiercely partisan to a particular point of view, and particular political party. This UK press impacts upon how other operators within the media ecosystem can operate. We do not have a balanced media. Anyone who thinks otherwise is simply delusional. Whether New Labour were right to pursue that strategy is a different question. Corbyn took a different one, and look how that turned out.
 




Peteinblack

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jun 3, 2004
4,135
Bath, Somerset.
Seems that Dorries has been looking in the mirror with some of her fellow Johnson sycophants

337365576_763359295407192_2791418668270436764_n.jpg
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I bet he lied "hand on heart" :shrug:
Conspiracy theory. Neither the report, the police nor the Privileges Committee are mentioning the Abba gathering (are we allowed to say party?) It seems as though that inquiry is hands-off. Is that why Johnson and Sunak paid their fines without arguing? Lots of rumours abound.
So many questions and so few answers.
 


KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
21,094
Wolsingham, County Durham
Conspiracy theory. Neither the report, the police nor the Privileges Committee are mentioning the Abba gathering (are we allowed to say party?) It seems as though that inquiry is hands-off. Is that why Johnson and Sunak paid their fines without arguing? Lots of rumours abound.
So many questions and so few answers.
What was the Abba gathering?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top