nicko31
Well-known member
Is this actually genuine?Controversial?
Is this actually genuine?Controversial?
I worry that Starmer (presumably after advice was offered) has made a mistake by cranking up the personal attacks on Sunak. By attacking a 4 month old PM for more than a decade's worth of (and I can't quite get my head around this) something to do with not locking up paedophiles, seems very nuanced. Only the dimmest of floating voter, the sort to daub threats on a paediatrician's house, are likely to be triggered here. And only if they can get their head around the accusation.Voted out at the next election, which is the only feasible and sensible way of getting rid of a toxic government.
Racist councillor has to resign. He is also a magistrate.
Conservative councillor who made slave comments withdraws from Tory party
A CONSERVATIVE member of Pembrokeshire County Council, alleged to have said that all white men should have a black slave, has withdrawn from the political group and referred himself to the Ombudsman. Conservative county councillor for Haverfordwest’s Prendergast ward Andrew Edwards is claimed to...pembrokeshire-herald.com
It should be... but no, I think not!Is this actually genuine?
Listening to Alastair Campbell on his podcast, he said before the advert nobody was listening to Labour on their law and order policies, now they are. It’s a crude way of getting attention to talk about what you want to, but it seems to have worked in that regard.I worry that Starmer (presumably after advice was offered) has made a mistake by cranking up the personal attacks on Sunak. By attacking a 4 month old PM for more than a decade's worth of (and I can't quite get my head around this) something to do with not locking up paedophiles, seems very nuanced. Only the dimmest of floating voter, the sort to daub threats on a paediatrician's house, are likely to be triggered here. And only if they can get their head around the accusation.
I heard a labour MP defend this on R5 this morning. A plucky display. But it smacked of a (semi-successful) argument in a debating society contest at a mid ranking university (better than East Anglia, not as prestigious as QMUL) where she won on points. Maybe. The tory spokesman quite rightly argued that by the same logic, a former DPP (*cough* Kier Starmer *cough*) supports paedophiles by failing to (something something something) Jimmy Savile.
I don't really see the value of nuanced posturing dog attacks, unless the trope already resonates, and the gambit firms up support. I think Sunak is a bit of a suit, but he obviously works hard and smart (even if his getting rich was simply the product of successfully wooing a rich bird - I couldn't do that - not that I'd want to, but anyway...) so to accuse him of being either lazy and useless, or pro-paedophile, strikes me as being a bit dim. There are easier ways' of showing someone is lazy and useless.
Never plan an ad campaign during a massive liquid lunch with fellow members of an opinion bubble. (I think there was a thread on NSC on this, years ago).
Is Starmer going to crush all my hopes and dreams? Hmmmmm.....
Hopefully someone will be along soon to explain how I have made a mistake....
I hope it doesn’t backfire as I’m not comfortable with it.Listening to Alastair Campbell on his podcast, he said before the advert nobody was listening to Labour on their law and order policies, now they are. It’s a crude way of getting attention to talk about what you want to, but it seems to have worked in that regard.
I feel that way too. Let's hope Labour can control their urges and not to become all Tory like.I hope it doesn’t backfire as I’m not comfortable with it.
So much low hanging fruit to attack the Tories, no need to head to the gutterI feel that way too. Let's hope Labour can control their urges and not to become all Tory like.
This did strike me as dim too. It’s worrying.I worry that Starmer (presumably after advice was offered) has made a mistake by cranking up the personal attacks on Sunak. By attacking a 4 month old PM for more than a decade's worth of (and I can't quite get my head around this) something to do with not locking up paedophiles, seems very nuanced. Only the dimmest of floating voter, the sort to daub threats on a paediatrician's house, are likely to be triggered here. And only if they can get their head around the accusation.
I heard a labour MP defend this on R5 this morning. A plucky display. But it smacked of a (semi-successful) argument in a debating society contest at a mid ranking university (better than East Anglia, not as prestigious as QMUL) where she won on points. Maybe. The tory spokesman quite rightly argued that by the same logic, a former DPP (*cough* Kier Starmer *cough*) supports paedophiles by failing to (something something something) Jimmy Savile.
I don't really see the value of nuanced posturing dog attacks, unless the trope already resonates, and the gambit firms up support. I think Sunak is a bit of a suit, but he obviously works hard and smart (even if his getting rich was simply the product of successfully wooing a rich bird - I couldn't do that - not that I'd want to, but anyway...) so to accuse him of being either lazy and useless, or pro-paedophile, strikes me as being a bit dim. There are easier ways' of showing someone is lazy and useless.
Never plan an ad campaign during a massive liquid lunch with fellow members of an opinion bubble. (I think there was a thread on NSC on this, years ago).
Is Starmer going to crush all my hopes and dreams? Hmmmmm.....
Hopefully someone will be along soon to explain how I have made a mistake....
Personally, I think it was a weird thing for Labour to do, but they don’t seem to be backing down on this. I saw Wes Streeting telling Trevor Phillips on telly this morning that he approved of it and that there was more (presumably of the same) to come.I worry that Starmer (presumably after advice was offered) has made a mistake by cranking up the personal attacks on Sunak. By attacking a 4 month old PM for more than a decade's worth of (and I can't quite get my head around this) something to do with not locking up paedophiles, seems very nuanced. Only the dimmest of floating voter, the sort to daub threats on a paediatrician's house, are likely to be triggered here. And only if they can get their head around the accusation.
I heard a labour MP defend this on R5 this morning. A plucky display. But it smacked of a (semi-successful) argument in a debating society contest at a mid ranking university (better than East Anglia, not as prestigious as QMUL) where she won on points. Maybe. The tory spokesman quite rightly argued that by the same logic, a former DPP (*cough* Kier Starmer *cough*) supports paedophiles by failing to (something something something) Jimmy Savile.
I don't really see the value of nuanced posturing dog attacks, unless the trope already resonates, and the gambit firms up support. I think Sunak is a bit of a suit, but he obviously works hard and smart (even if his getting rich was simply the product of successfully wooing a rich bird - I couldn't do that - not that I'd want to, but anyway...) so to accuse him of being either lazy and useless, or pro-paedophile, strikes me as being a bit dim. There are easier ways' of showing someone is lazy and useless.
Never plan an ad campaign during a massive liquid lunch with fellow members of an opinion bubble. (I think there was a thread on NSC on this, years ago).
Is Starmer going to crush all my hopes and dreams? Hmmmmm.....
Hopefully someone will be along soon to explain how I have made a mistake....
I hate that sort of campaigning but it (unfortunately) works. It gets people talking the Government's record. It's caught the Tories out because they didn't expect it from Labour and its exactly the way they are going to fight the next election.This did strike me as dim too. It’s worrying.
The Tory attack dogs just concentrate on the Boats and Gender as a stick on Starmer
If there is any high ground left, then Starmer has to try and take it.
Keep concentrating on real life issues and not
just get into the cesspool to pick a fight with the likes of Lee Anderson
My thoughts too, if we keep out of the gutter and the Tories can't find too much mud to fling elsewhere, we should have a landslide. But I do feel Keir still needs to be more dynamic to shut off any slight chance of them winning too many seats, every seat will count to turn around the countries rebuild.So much low hanging fruit to attack the Tories, no need to head to the gutter
NHS on the brink, broken economy, spiralling debt, cronyism etc etc
Sunak being investigated by Watchdog
And he is meant to be the calming reassuarance of modern Conservatism
Then attack the actual problems with him, not the old “paedo” shit. It’s lowest common denominator.I think Labour HAVE to attack Sunak personally, otherwise there is a danger some voters will conclude Rishi is a lot better and more stable than Boris / Liz Truss / Theresa May and deserves another 4 years to sort out their mess.