The report isn't a report of evidence anyway. It is setting out what they want to ask Johnson. That will be his evidence, which they will then take into account alongside everything else. Then they will publish their actual report.Referring back to the "Nor is there any evidence in the report that" point, I find it compelling that he did not say "I did not....". He knew he was rule breaking, he didn't care and lying about it is normal for him. Fukk him and the poor horse he rode in on.