Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...



WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,766
It's far from perfect, but switching from FPTP to an Aussie-style Preferential system would be a step in the right direction. At least with a preferences system, those voters hard-opposed to a Tory government can freely vote for their preferred centre / left party in the knowledge that they can put the others ahead of the Tories and still see their vote count to potentially prevent a Tory MP in their seat.

As it stands with FPTP, you need to see a large % of the electorate choose to vote tactically. Tends to work in by elections (cf recent Lib Dem wins), but not so well in a GE - especially when you have competing tactical voting sites with opposing recommendations (as we did at the last GE). With preferential system, tactical voting becomes a whole lot easier. Don't want a Tory MP? Put them last on your ballot paper. If at least 50.01% of the electorate in your seat do the same, then you don't get a Tory elected. Job done.

How many seats out there had a centre-left majority at the last GE and yet still returned a Tory MP with substantially less than 50% of the vote going to a Tory or a.n.other right party? Guessing the answer is plenty, and while we might still have a Tory government right now it certainly wouldn't be an 80-seat majority.

I think that what is missed with FPTP is that it actively encourages huge coalition parties that have extremes at both wings, that they try to then manage in order to be electable. If cracks start to show, they then have to try and wallpaper over those cracks taking more and more desperate measures, in order to stay in power (see Cameron). All power struggles are contained within that one party with no input from the electorate at large. So if one extremist group in the party then managed to take over completely and kicked out anyone not from that side, that is what the country will get.

Could you imagine what could happen ???
 








Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
The press would have hounded Corbyn out of the job long before he could have:-

Lied to the Queen.
Held illegal parties.
Handed billions of pounds over to friends.
Allowed Hancock to be a hanCock.

And of course




Strided manfully, unmasked, through a f**king hospital.



Thank God our press is independent.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,005
Pattknull med Haksprut
Biggest winners from all of this are China and Russia. They can point out to the choices of Johnson v Corbyn here in the UK and Trump v Biden in the US and say to their people, "Well if that's all that democracy has to offer, you might as well keep with an autocratic regime instead".
 






keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,972
But, again, that's not the point. Corbyn was NEVER going to win a General Election in this country, but by being on the ballot paper it effectively handed Johnson the keys to Number 10.

But why? Why is Corbyn unelectable and Johnson and Trump are?

Liz Truss is likely to the next PM, Is she electable? I wouldn't just not trust her to lead the country, I wouldn't trust her to do my scanning at work
 






WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,766
Biggest winners from all of this are China and Russia. They can point out to the choices of Johnson v Corbyn here in the UK and Trump v Biden in the US and say to their people, "Well if that's all that democracy has to offer, you might as well keep with an autocratic regime instead".

I'm starting to think benign dictatorship is the best way forward :wink:
 




Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
8,624
And herein lies the problem.
As an electorate we believe a credible Prime ministerial candidate should be:
  • Upper class
  • Self serving
  • Dismissive of the needs of the common person

We get the government we deserve because we consistently vote for *****.

We do. This is true.

And the parties elect people like this to lead these parties because they know that the public will hold their nose and vote for proven dishonest or incompetent people.

While the public doesn't demand better and act on those demands in the ballot box, we'll continue to be served up with this dross
 






vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,272
Biggest winners from all of this are China and Russia. They can point out to the choices of Johnson v Corbyn here in the UK and Trump v Biden in the US and say to their people, "Well if that's all that democracy has to offer, you might as well keep with an autocratic regime instead".
Was it Theresa May who coined the slogan of " Strong and Stable " for the Tory Government?... A lot has changed since that [emoji1787]!!!!
 








Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,106
Faversham
It's clearly not, regardless of how much you want it to be, alas.

I've stated on here, repeaedly, how bad I think Johnson has been.

And whilst I have no idea how Corbyn would have faired as PM, it's hard to imagine anyone could have been worse than what we've had. So I'm certainly willing to guess that Corbyn would have done a better job. (Sorry for saying that, as I know it's just blown your narrative about me.)

But, again, that's not the point. Corbyn was NEVER going to win a General Election in this country, but by being on the ballot paper it effectively handed Johnson the keys to Number 10.

Very elegantly put :bowdown:
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,106
Faversham
Because you know that you'd never win any fight against me involving brain power, thicko.

That's not the most well-judged comment I have ever read on NSB. NB is a very measured poster in my not-very-humble opinion :shrug:
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,106
Faversham








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here