- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,766
It's far from perfect, but switching from FPTP to an Aussie-style Preferential system would be a step in the right direction. At least with a preferences system, those voters hard-opposed to a Tory government can freely vote for their preferred centre / left party in the knowledge that they can put the others ahead of the Tories and still see their vote count to potentially prevent a Tory MP in their seat.
As it stands with FPTP, you need to see a large % of the electorate choose to vote tactically. Tends to work in by elections (cf recent Lib Dem wins), but not so well in a GE - especially when you have competing tactical voting sites with opposing recommendations (as we did at the last GE). With preferential system, tactical voting becomes a whole lot easier. Don't want a Tory MP? Put them last on your ballot paper. If at least 50.01% of the electorate in your seat do the same, then you don't get a Tory elected. Job done.
How many seats out there had a centre-left majority at the last GE and yet still returned a Tory MP with substantially less than 50% of the vote going to a Tory or a.n.other right party? Guessing the answer is plenty, and while we might still have a Tory government right now it certainly wouldn't be an 80-seat majority.
I think that what is missed with FPTP is that it actively encourages huge coalition parties that have extremes at both wings, that they try to then manage in order to be electable. If cracks start to show, they then have to try and wallpaper over those cracks taking more and more desperate measures, in order to stay in power (see Cameron). All power struggles are contained within that one party with no input from the electorate at large. So if one extremist group in the party then managed to take over completely and kicked out anyone not from that side, that is what the country will get.
Could you imagine what could happen