No, again, I apologise. I don't wish to hold you to account. All I will say is that, to me, leaving the EU was a monumental change, and it would need to have monumentally positive consequences, tangible and predicatble, to justify the risk.
A good mate of mine, university educated, well off, played poker once with The Lizard, voted leave for good reasons, but now regrets it on the grounds that nothing tangibly good has been obtained, and some disadvantages have arisen. He was mainly against 'red tape' and finds that his red tape has increased since we left.
I suppose the pivotal issue is that if you feel that it hardly matters either way whether we stay or leave, what is the motivation to vote leave? It all seems....somewhat quixotic.
Oh well, never mind. Take care of yourself. Chat again soon
Of course you are entitled to vote for whatever reason you choose. But each time you come on NSC and then tell us what a good idea it was to do that (the only ones I pick up on are why you voted for Brexit or Johnson), I will point out a simple factual reason why it wasn't and ask you for a response as to why you think it was a good idea ? At that point you will then refuse to discuss it, give some excuse that you don't understand it, or often refuse to post any further.
And we go round and round this every few months, always the same, always the same result, and I really can't understand why you keep instigating it
Do keep up
