Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,666
Greedy sociopaths don't.He doesn't do empathy at all well ....
His chat with the homeless guy at the soup kitchen was all I needed to see. Not a clue.
Greedy sociopaths don't.He doesn't do empathy at all well ....
Chin up chap.This thread is such a depressing list of what a corrupt cabal in complete breakdown keep doing whilst the fabric of the UK implodes around them.
The only highspots are the occasional forays into whataboutism by the last desperate dregs of the cabal's support. Betting odds, misogyny, but, but, but what about Starmer, wokeism etc etc ............... very brief comical interludes amongst the death throes. If only someone had warned about what would happen ..... oh
Like Handcock. He was/is a personality vacuum. He shouldve been sacked for the failure to produce fake tears episode alone.He doesn't do empathy at all well, which you'd have thought was a core attribute for a politician to rise to the top of the greasy pole. He just comes across as very detached ("I don't have any working class friends") and that the PM job is all part of his career trajectory.
Ah, Ed Miliband, reminds me of my favourite all time tweet.Like Handcock. He was/is a personality vacuum. He shouldve been sacked for the failure to produce fake tears episode alone.
Yet Ed Miliband was vilified for looking a bit strange whilst eating a bacon sandwich.
I still cant work out all these years later why they didnt just get him a cup of tea/coffee or a glass of water.
that’s not worn well has it?
It's not just the lack of empathy: he can't think on his feet either. He turned up today with pre-scripted answers and looked lost when Starmer departed from his expected attack. His transphobic response was appalling but anyone with real political instinct would have shied away. Cameron wouldn't have done it, Major wouldn't have done it, Hague wouldn't have done it, I don't even think May would have done, even Johnson would have thought better of it ... but Sunak blundered right in.He doesn't do empathy at all well, which you'd have thought was a core attribute for a politician to rise to the top of the greasy pole. He just comes across as very detached ("I don't have any working class friends") and that the PM job is all part of his career trajectory.
Agree with most of this. Johnson would have waded in if he sensed political advantage, and I suspect Truss would too (not that she left too many clues while PM).It's not just the lack of empathy: he can't think on his feet either. He turned up today with pre-scripted answers and looked lost when Starmer departed from his expected attack. His transphobic response was appalling but anyone with real political instinct would have shied away. Cameron wouldn't have done it, Major wouldn't have done it, Hague wouldn't have done it, I don't even think May would have done, even Johnson would have thought better of it ... but Sunak blundered right in.
The leader debates before the election are going to be a bloodbath. Sunak has no debating skills whatsoever and he's going to be up against a KC whose entire professional life revolves around thinking on his feet. And he won't have the help of a compliant Speaker either but a hard-nosed journalist who'll want to see blood. The Tories must be dreading this.
Aged like milk.that’s not worn well has it?
Won't be a bloodbath as he'll give them a swerve, like you he'll know he doesn't stand a chance.The leader debates before the election are going to be a bloodbath.
Bit odd isn’t it?Aged like milk.
Won't be a bloodbath as he'll give them a swerve, like you he'll know he doesn't stand a chance.
I'm not sure I'd agree with this. The leader debates do have an impact - look at the boost it gave Nick Clegg in 2010, there was an immediate leap in the LD showing and they scored the most seats for some time. Clegg wasn't a particularly engaging speaker, but he handled himself well in the debates. And we haven't seen a leader fall apart yet but, if anyone will, I think Sunak will.I doubt KS will inspire too many through his thinking on his feet, nor will it cause voters to switch parties -- he's just not an engaging speaker (like Blair, Hague and Johnson was/is and, to a lesser extent, Cameron too).
Yeah and Brown was rubbish in those and looked dreadful.I'm not sure I'd agree with this. The leader debates do have an impact - look at the boost it gave Nick Clegg in 2010, there was an immediate leap in the LD showing and they scored the most seats for some time. Clegg wasn't a particularly engaging speaker, but he handled himself well in the debates. And we haven't seen a leader fall apart yet but, if anyone will, I think Sunak will.
I do agree with your line "if they happen", I can see the Tories pulling out of these because they know what a disaster they'll be for Sunak. And I'm not sure swapping leaders will help - unless they pick Mordaunt - the others all look pretty hopeless. Mordaunt isn't: she's a skilled debater but she's not a members' favourite, so has no chance.
And swapping leaders isn’t out of the question given the local elections in May.I'm not sure I'd agree with this. The leader debates do have an impact - look at the boost it gave Nick Clegg in 2010, there was an immediate leap in the LD showing and they scored the most seats for some time. Clegg wasn't a particularly engaging speaker, but he handled himself well in the debates. And we haven't seen a leader fall apart yet but, if anyone will, I think Sunak will.
I do agree with your line "if they happen", I can see the Tories pulling out of these because they know what a disaster they'll be for Sunak. And I'm not sure swapping leaders will help - unless they pick Mordaunt - the others all look pretty hopeless. Mordaunt isn't: she's a skilled debater but she's not a members' favourite, so has no chance.
I agree totally.PMQ's are horrendous today.
Really not looking to the election campaign when it kick off, the Tories are a wounded animal fighting to survive and they are to fight very dirty. 2019 was pretty bad but I fear this will reach new depths.
No at best it was clumsy . at worst it was a clueless twat trying to inflame more culture wars against vulnerable people to deflect from his parties failings.I agree totally.
Today's comment was clumsy at worst, yet the political capital sought and screaming for policemen is embarrassing and a sign of poor things to come.
Trying to claw votes away from The Reform Party isn't a good look for the Tories.No at best it was clumsy . at worst it was a clueless twat trying to inflame more culture wars against vulnerable people to deflect from his parties failings.
I agree totally.
Today's comment was clumsy at worst, yet the political capital sought and screaming for policemen is embarrassing and a sign of poor things to come.
Without wanting to be too argumentative they obviously aren't that impactful if you can only point to one four elections ago in which the leader of a third party did well -- he had somewhat of a free pass in that one which was the first IIRC. That said, the core point I was trying (and failing) to make is that KS is not a great speaker, and I doubt he'll win too many over in the debates -- not that he'll need to, he'll just need to ensure he doesn't fall apart and I doubt he will largely for the reasons you identify: he can think on his feet, knows his brief and doesn't get flustered.I'm not sure I'd agree with this. The leader debates do have an impact - look at the boost it gave Nick Clegg in 2010, there was an immediate leap in the LD showing and they scored the most seats for some time. Clegg wasn't a particularly engaging speaker, but he handled himself well in the debates. And we haven't seen a leader fall apart yet but, if anyone will, I think Sunak will.
I do agree with your line "if they happen", I can see the Tories pulling out of these because they know what a disaster they'll be for Sunak. And I'm not sure swapping leaders will help - unless they pick Mordaunt - the others all look pretty hopeless. Mordaunt isn't: she's a skilled debater but she's not a members' favourite, so has no chance.