glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
someone from palarse shite on the pavement
Michael Gove as Environment Secretary. The same Gove who wanted to drop climate change from the school curriculum
She'll have changed her mind in the morning.
I know that that was just a throw away joke, but it really bugs me that changing your mind is used to beat politicians of all shades. We voters change our minds all over the time, and as events change then it is inevitable that initial interpretations will have to be revised, and yet it is considered to be a cardinal sin rather than sensible revision.
I know that that was just a throw away joke, but it really bugs me that changing your mind is used to beat politicians of all shades. We voters change our minds all over the time, and as events change then it is inevitable that initial interpretations will have to be revised, and yet it is considered to be a cardinal sin rather than sensible revision.
I agree, and it's one of my bug-bears that a "U-turn" is deemed to be the worst of all political sin, when actually I do WANT a politician to be prepared to change their mind when they realise the strength of view coming from the public, especially if the point being raised is a good and valid one. Of course you want them to be right first time, and have the courage of their convictions, but I do also want them to LISTEN.
Climate change is part of the curriculum? What an absolute waste of time that is.
I know that that was just a throw away joke, but it really bugs me that changing your mind is used to beat politicians of all shades. We voters change our minds all over the time, and as events change then it is inevitable that initial interpretations will have to be revised, and yet it is considered to be a cardinal sin rather than sensible revision.
I agree completely. So I'm just going to repeat what you said, as 'I agree' doesn't feel sufficient.I agree, and it's one of my bug-bears that a "U-turn" is deemed to be the worst of all political sin, when actually I do WANT a politician to be prepared to change their mind when they realise the strength of view coming from the public, especially if the point being raised is a good and valid one. Of course you want them to be right first time, and have the courage of their convictions, but I do also want them to LISTEN.
I agree, and it's one of my bug-bears that a "U-turn" is deemed to be the worst of all political sin, when actually I do WANT a politician to be prepared to change their mind when they realise the strength of view coming from the public, especially if the point being raised is a good and valid one. Of course you want them to be right first time, and have the courage of their convictions, but I do also want them to LISTEN.
I agree, and it's one of my bug-bears that a "U-turn" is deemed to be the worst of all political sin, when actually I do WANT a politician to be prepared to change their mind when they realise the strength of view coming from the public, especially if the point being raised is a good and valid one. Of course you want them to be right first time, and have the courage of their convictions, but I do also want them to LISTEN.
Teaching children about one of the most important issues of modern times? Yeah a complete waste of time!
I'd rather that time was spent improving English and Math standards.
So you want secondary schools to ONLY teach English and Maths? It's not an either/or!
Of course not. However, I'd rather the time spent discussing climate change was used improving English and Math standards.
Of course not. However, I'd rather the time spent discussing climate change was used improving English and Math standards.
So what do you suggest they do in Geography and Science (where climate change is currently taught)? Surely in these subjects teaching about such an important issue is vital?
I know that that was just a throw away joke, but it really bugs me that changing your mind is used to beat politicians of all shades. We voters change our minds all over the time, and as events change then it is inevitable that initial interpretations will have to be revised, and yet it is considered to be a cardinal sin rather than sensible revision.