Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,874
He kept getting in the way ...the ball hit him a few times changing the flowOther than the stupid yellow for JPVH didn’t really notice him which is what should happen more often
He kept getting in the way ...the ball hit him a few times changing the flowOther than the stupid yellow for JPVH didn’t really notice him which is what should happen more often
Which country do you associate with the colour orange?Surprised the officials were allowed to wear Orange
Just trying to explain that when someone has a lot of experience in a sporting discipline they tend to be more analytical and over critical at times.Cricket? What’s that got to do with tonight?
And this is why we have VAR that was a howler from the ref, not even a technicality that would have got us something extra he was clearly through with a bloody good chance of scoring....... second was. Crouchy thought so too, ref claimed shoulder barge but it wasn't, he used his elbow and no intention of playing ball.
Whereas Sidwell thought different. I’d like to see it again but the replays I watched last night made me think I’d be very disappointed if that was given against us. At best it was 40/60 in our favourFirst wasn't imho, second was. Crouchy thought so too, ref claimed shoulder barge but it wasn't, he used his elbow and no intention of playing ball.
Ref was poor, Mitoma yellow was ridiculous and whilst van hecke was a foul it was never a yellow, he let off one of theirs with a miles worse crunching late challenge on Gilmour.
Plus he kept getting in way of our attacking players in first half near edge of box, his positioning was rubbish.
The boards, I hate the lack of info. I had no idea who got our first yellow until I looked online.I thought he stopped right on 45 but the shitty Europa boards stop at 45 + 90 so it might have been a bit longer?
Didn’t look like that side on. 50/50 initially, PvH got spun and then pulled him back.I’ve not seen a replay of Van Hecke’s yellow, but from my view right behind the North goal, it looked like as the ball was coming over and both players were watching it, the Ajax player had wrapped his arms round VH, and so when he spun round, dragged VH on top of him. But like I say, not seen it again so might be wrong
How could you not notice him? - He got in the way half a dozen times, including a pass that hit him - poor positioning so many times.Other than the stupid yellow for JPVH didn’t really notice him which is what should happen more often
Yep, that - had a pretty clear view of it from our seats, yellow was fair enough.Didn’t look like that side on. 50/50 initially, PvH got spun and then pulled him back.
That's bizarre. I thought they usually added on X seconds each time there were substitutions so at the very least you usually get 1-2 minutes.Fourth official indicated '0 minutes'. Not much to do with the ref.
Was puzzled when he seemed to stop play when Dunk had the ball to allow subs to happen.
There were no subs int he first half.That's bizarre. I thought they usually added on X seconds each time there were substitutions so at the very least you usually get 1-2 minutes.
The holding was by both players, him booking van hecke for that was laughable. You expect refs to fall for it and punish the defender, which is why attackers play to taht, but a booking? No wayHis general refereeing was very good. The Mitoma card was a bit odd as was the non yellow card for a foul on Gilmour. The Van Hecke card was justified as he held the player en route and continued to hold as he turned.....
...but it would be no fun without the ref thread.
If you are going to start a thread for this referee you may as well do it for all of them.
Oh
Ah ok, fair enough - yellow then!Didn’t look like that side on. 50/50 initially, PvH got spun and then pulled him back.
i did not know thisUnless things have changed the ref tells the 4th official how much time is to be added.
The subs thing was very odd though.