What's the betting that despite all the explanations, someone will still come on here and moan about the offside being taken in our half!!!
I bow to your greater knowledge but why was this law changed? Doesn’t it make the Lino look a bit of a prat standing there with his flag pointing across the pitch?
It was changed in an attempt to speed up the game. At the same time as they brought in the one about not needing to play the ball forwards from the kickoff.
I can feel a telling off coming. Piltdown......
I give up. If some wish to continue to post utter shite because they’re ignorant of the laws of the game that’s their issue.
Yep, you are right on the offside.
View attachment 103029
Having seen the replay I think the assistant has to flag and then let the ref make a decision as to whether he was interfering. Good case that he was, but we’d have been upset if it was given against us...
I thought the ref was OK a bit inconsistent but that's all
Really?
Well he might have slightly favoured the bigger team but all in all we were the architects of our own failures not the refs
They wouldn't have the time or energy to read it. Better to get someone else to do it and get straight to the point.I wish someone like Paul Barber could send a report to the referees association detailing these things. Referees must be accountable. I know they're human, and can make mistakes, but when it is so blatant, then a club has a right to make representations.
Must have been watching a different game, the guy, and his assistants were a complete liability. You, I guess, thought the offside free kick taken 10 yards inside our half was legit? The elbow on Knocky? The pull back on March? The offside first goal - debatable but legitimate? Alonso staying on the pitch? Yeah he was ok for sure.
There had to be one!!!
Read the thread, it's been explained why it was legit on numerous occasions.No comprende.
Read the thread, it's been explained why it was legit on numerous occasions.
Couldn't be arsed, sorry.