However, it is a 'would rather not live with them, but we're screwed without them'.
That's just it.We don't know if we are 'screwed'.I'm willing to take a chance.I'm willing to lose something to gain something else.
However, it is a 'would rather not live with them, but we're screwed without them'.
I'd suspect the reason why the EU wanted free movement was for the wealthy countries to get overrun with migrants because the birth rates are so low in most European countries.They don't care about cultural divides etc as they only care about cheap labour and population increases.lets end these free movement lies that we have to sign up to it no matter what
when the EU Free Trade Agreements were made with Mexico and South Korea did they involve free movement? Do the Free Trade Agreements waiting to be ratified with Columbia and Peru include free movement? Do the EU Free Trade Agreements under negotiation with Australia,New Zealand,Singapore,Vietnam,Thailand, Philippines,Malaysia,Ecuador,India or Japan insist on free movement.Do the extensive trade agreements with Canada(CETA) or USA(TTIP) also include free movement?
The EU can insist all they want,the fact is a Brexit vote is also a vote to end free movement to the UK.
If this does occur I await the first jackass who will commit political suicide and will openly say they will ignore the referendum result and will enter into negotiations with the EU to continue free movement.
As a professional economist I don't know a single colleague who thinks we wouldn't be worse off if we left the EU. In the FT survey of 100 top economists in December 2015, 76 thought that the UK would be worse off in the medium term, 18 said no difference and 8 said we'd be better off. It's not complete consensus but for a notoriously divided profession it's not bad.
Sorry I edited to add the bonus question above. Also curious how you think Canada has a 99% free trade deal?
As you pointed out, we are not Norway and neither are we Canada.
...As an aside the EU will have the UK over a barrel with Britain's EU financial services surplus.
I said 99% of tariffs and provided a link to a source you might believe the European Commision.
Completely agree we are the 5th largest economy in the world second biggest in Europe and a major political and military power we are far more likely to get a better deal than Norway/Canada combined.
Firstly it's not Financial Services, and that's a large chunk of the UK's exports to the EU. Secondly it's not been ratified so it's an unagreed deal. Lastly things like meat and food have restrictions on them. Also Canada had to allow all EU countries visa free entry amoungst other things.
I can't believe you are trying to suggest the variables involved in the promotion race are at all analogous to the future path of dozens of economies across Europe. What were the opinions of those 76 'top economists' on joining the Euro? If the shoe was on the other foot I would hope I wasn't quite so gullible in believing opinion which is notoriously unreliable sourced from a biased pro EU paper.
Good debate NSC, .
its removal of 98% of tariffs though
Visa free entry for travel where you still have to prove if asked that you intend to return home and are financially self dependant for the duration of your visit is not the same as free movement to live and work
You alluded that the taking back of laws most important. Maybe they are to you. But they aren't worth taking back by gambling our economy IMO.
I agree with your main point here. Can you have a word with Iain Duncan Smith, who has announced that because the Turks are getting visa-free travel to the EU, the EU's borders are being extended from Greece to Syria. He obviously thinks that visa-free and free movement are the same. Either that or he is scaremongering.