Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] The Trossard "push"



Stephen Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2015
466
Barcelona
I do feel referees should be more clever with VAR, by waiting until the phase of play has been completed, then use VAR to aid their decision making.

If the ball doesn't end up in the back of the net, theres nothing doing, but if it does (which it did today), take a look at the monitor.

That's not refs bottling decisions, just using technology to their advantage

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

This is my thinking with the initial post. If he feels there's a foul, great, allow the play to continue (as they do with offside) and then check it. We can't continue to allow human error (or the potential for human error) to dictate the outcome.
 




PoG

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2013
1,120
Weak AF decision. Those saying he probably wouldn't have scored need to give their heads a wobble.
 


Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,203
Weak AF decision. Those saying he probably wouldn't have scored need to give their heads a wobble.

Bookies would take money off you all day long at even money Trossard scores...
 


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,329
Withdean area
Never a foul in the first 150 years of organised football, imho not a foul in the current era of ref-backed diving.

The most minuscule of touches on the upper back in a pure leg race, ‘brought down’ a cheat only because he knew he’d screwed up.

The Sky commentator and pundits were spot on in their analysis from what I saw.
 


golddene

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2012
2,019
Never a foul in the first 150 years of organised football, imho not a foul in the current era of ref-backed diving.

The most minuscule of touches on the upper back in a pure leg race, ‘brought down’ a cheat only because he knew he’d screwed up.

The Sky commentator and pundits were spot on in their analysis from what I saw.

Absolutely this even the motd pundits agree no foul.
 






Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,513
Worthing
Can anyone stick up any of the replays? Why was this not reviewed? How can a clear goalscoring opportunity just be brushed aside by a ref who, for the most part had a good game.

Don’t review those. Ref made decision. End of. It’s not like offside.
 


Old fashioned refereeing error, the kind of thing we’d be moaning about every week but we now have VAR to take up that energy. A classic case of do you want more or less VAR than currently? If it’s less, you suck up the error and accept refs are fallible. Trossard should keep his arms down in future situations
 






BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,222
I thought I saw a push, Tross pushed out an arm and the fella went down under contact.

It is soft as shite but certainly in keeping with the current rules.

IMHCHUOL (In My Humble, Clearly Highly Unpopular Opinion Like)
 


Berty23

Well-known member
Jun 26, 2012
3,654
I am with Ian wright and all of the other pundits. Not a push. He barely even touched him and the chap slipped. I would out that up there with the Burnley goal against Leeds. Shocking decision.
 




Sarisbury Seagull

Solly March Fan Club
NSC Patron
Nov 22, 2007
15,014
Sarisbury Green, Southampton
It wasn’t a foul but Trossard made it too easy for the ref to give it as soon as he raised his arms and touched the defender. He was always going to give the free kick at that point.

One of my biggest frustrations in football is when defenders are going back towards their goal and the attackers get too close and end up fouling them when there’s no need and likewise, Trossard didn’t need to raise his arms.
 


East London Exile

Active member
Jan 13, 2013
100
London
Having seen it again, the assistant who was level with them and close did not raise the flag and the ref, watching from a good distance, blew the whistle. I would have thought if it was a clear foul the assistant would give it.
Goalie did not really make an effort to stop it as the whistle had gone but I think there should have been a chance to see how it played out and use VAR if a goal was scored.
 


BN9 BHA

DOCKERS
NSC Patron
Jul 14, 2013
22,693
Newhaven
Just before Dan Burn was substituted we had a corner, 2 Wolves players were all over Burn who ended up on the floor, much more heavy handed than Trossard’s push, the ref didn’t see it obviously, why am I surprised?
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I thought I saw a push, Tross pushed out an arm and the fella went down under contact.

It is soft as shite but certainly in keeping with the current rules.

IMHCHUOL (In My Humble, Clearly Highly Unpopular Opinion Like)

The camera angles show it wasn’t a push. The ref was 25 yards behind, not keeping up with play. Sian Massey didn’t raise her flag and she was level watching every move.
 


blockhseagull

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2006
7,364
Southampton
Just before Dan Burn was substituted we had a corner, 2 Wolves players were all over Burn who ended up on the floor, much more heavy handed than Trossard’s push, the ref didn’t see it obviously, why am I surprised?

Not sure if it is was the same one I saw but he was pulled to the floor from the corner that Webster hit the bar and then Swiss Andy hit the rebound over.
 


trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,955
Hove
Old fashioned refereeing error, the kind of thing we’d be moaning about every week but we now have VAR to take up that energy. A classic case of do you want more or less VAR than currently? If it’s less, you suck up the error and accept refs are fallible. Trossard should keep his arms down in future situations

I agree this is pretty much where we are at. Stinking decision but if we’re ever to get out of the VAR wormhole, we’ve got to accept refs won’t ever get everything right. Maybe it was better when they got things wrong like this - in a split second - than now, when they watch it 30 times and still make a baffling decision.

If it had gone to VAR, would they have decided it was a ‘clear and obvious error’? Possibly not, because Trossard touched the defender. So they could think ‘no foul’ but also that it was understandable the ref gave it, and so not intervene. They’re, bizarrely, not actually judging the incident, but the referee. Which is one reason why its implementation is a crock of shit.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,191
Faversham
I do feel referees should be more clever with VAR, by waiting until the phase of play has been completed, then use VAR to aid their decision making.

If the ball doesn't end up in the back of the net, theres nothing doing, but if it does (which it did today), take a look at the monitor.

That's not refs bottling decisions, just using technology to their advantage

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

Correct. Technology is useful but referees can be idiots. Who knew?
 


Terry Butcher Tribute Act

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2013
3,687
I thought I saw a push, Tross pushed out an arm and the fella went down under contact.

It is soft as shite but certainly in keeping with the current rules.

IMHCHUOL (In My Humble, Clearly Highly Unpopular Opinion Like)
Agreed. Not sure what the fuss is about. Soft free kicks like that are given in every game now

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here