No, it’s more likely due to pressure being bought to bear on the BBC by an overbearing government and Home Secretary who will jump on any polarized point of view to win votes. It’s Trump’s strategy - divide and conquer. And it’s a very dangerous strategy. It’s what so many who we remember have died trying to prevent.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] The Right Honourable Suella Braverman. KC MP **Sacked 13/11**
- Thread starter Eeyore
- Start date
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,791
No arrests at the ceasefire march but the right wing lunatics are kicking lumps out of the police at the cenotaph.
What is Suella Braverman going to have to say about that?
What is Suella Braverman going to have to say about that?
Football Lads have a right to defend themselves?
Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,671
The Met are tofu eating wokeratti
Something along the lines of…….
“Instead of fighting with loyal citizens commemorating Armistice day. The Met had an opportunity to crack down on Islamic extremism but let them march and chant unchecked. We can no longer allow the Police to give those hundreds of thousands of people who supported Hamas and terrorism a free pass.”
92 counter protestor (right wing ****s) arrests.
0 Palestinian march arrests.
Few more arrests to make today; get Braverman in cuffs and on trial and the editors of the Mail and The Express.
Lock them up. Lock them up. Lock them up.
0 Palestinian march arrests.
Few more arrests to make today; get Braverman in cuffs and on trial and the editors of the Mail and The Express.
Lock them up. Lock them up. Lock them up.
He's such a whelp, wonder how much "Tommy" has made today.
The Guardian have called it a pro Palestine March as well.
There is pro Palestine chanting and flags.
I'm sure there is a mixture of reasons for people being there
That would be a bit like when the Rolling Stones hired the Hell's Angels to do their security at the Altamont Festival. That worked out well.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,752
Are you sure you've got this right ?
Only that's the exact same Government and Home Secretary that @Wokeworrier has been a huge supporter and campaigner throughout many years (and accounts) on NSC. And that would imply that he really doesn't understand what he's supporting and campaigning for again
Machiavelli
Well-known member
She'll haul Rowley over the coals. The Met doing what it always does: letting Hamas terrorists run riot on the streets of the capital, while targeting law-abiding, patriotic, family-centred, hard-working taxpayers
Coalburner
Active member
- May 22, 2017
- 315
me too
I think you are right. But I think that a huge number are just there to call for a ceasefire.
No ditches??
Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Cruellas' finest hour, stupid bitch
- Oct 20, 2022
- 6,928
About ‘locking her up’ - One of the lynchpins of a liberal democracy ensuring it not becoming a far-right or far left regime is separation of powers (between the Government, Parliament and the Judiciary) - It has had little media attention but Braverman’s reforms to Judicial Review will put the Government above the law
This ‘reform’ of judicial review will put the government above the law | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to David Davis’s article about the implications of the proposed changes to the system of legal checks on ministers’ powers
www.theguardian.com
The existing Judicial Review court cases against the Home Secretary arise out of the principle of ultra vires (where she has acted ‘beyond the power of’ her Ministerial authority) where she has amended Statute legislation with sweeping changes to the right to protest by introducing secondary legislation through the back door thus bypassing parliament (who had already voted them down). Braverman’s reforms to the Judiciary will make JR action like this very difficult and subject it to an onerous test of the validity of claims - Judicial Review could be refused by the courts because under the Government’s new proposed reforms to JR, anything that challenges Ministerial power, could be deemed politically motivated rather than adjudged to be a legitimate challenge based on the principles of law. A bit complicated and obscure but a proposal for fundamental change that has gone unnoticed which could have far reaching implications - (Conversely, so much is made in the MSM of Trump swinging the SCOTUS to the far right with his appointments to the Court and appointing judges with far right sympathies on the lower courts or Netanyahu’s attempts to make sweeping changes to the Judiciary in Israel that would put challenging the decision of his Government out of reach but the majority of the British public don’t even notice it when moves are underfoot to make that happen in our own Country.
The government’s reforms to judicial review must respect the separation of powers | Institute for Government
Any further reforms to the relationship between the courts and the executive should not neuter judicial review or undermine the separation of powers
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Last edited:
Alas, I don’t unfortunately think she is stupid and knew exactly what she would stir up. Just a heartless calculating person.
I concur. Also, appreciate the use of person rather than bitch.
nicko31
Well-known member
The Met Police has said its officers were met with violence and abuse from counter-protesters, who threw bottles and other missiles.
Bad day for Cruella
Wokeworrier
Active member
Well, thats a lovely conspiracy theory but as pointed out already, the Guardian newspaper amongst others (see also Daily Mirror) not known for bowing to supposed government pressure, also describe the march as 'Pro Palestinian'.... probably because it clearly is.
- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,091
And not one single arrest.
But the 'defenders of the cenotaph' clocked up nearly a ton !
Suella's 'mob' turn out to be law-abiding, while the Met knew exactly who their customers were.
Wokeworrier, your boys took one hell of a beating!