Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Effectively 145-4. Can England get through this huge partnership for NZ?
Yes, at the time that's what I thought. I thought he was a bit too aggressive and I agreed with the other posters (and commentators) who bemoaned the fact that he'd thrown his wicket away ...Yes, when it works it is amazing but in this day and age an opposition team will work out a plan for Stokes if he wants to come out all guns blazing. By all means he should have a swing now and again but he needs to pick the right ball....not all six an over.....we had absolutely the same thing with KP...." That's the way I play " starts to wear a bit thin when clunking it to midwicket third ball time after time.
... but actually that's correct. In the 'old days' this match on this wicket would have been a 500 plays 500 bore draw and the last two days would just be the two teams going through the motions: bat sensibly, don't want to lose. Yawn. Another nail in the coffin of Test cricket.It wasn't third ball today though, was it? 46 off 33 balls. And the context being we're trying to introduce more positivity in both batting and bowling and this game is heading rapidly for a draw.
We've got a fascinating final day in prospect with all four results possible.
1) England win.
2) NZ win.
3) Draw.
4) Um… Rock, paper, scissors?
4) Tie*
Christ, imagine the tension of a Test Match going down to the final ball with all four outcomes still possible. Two required off the last ball with 9 wickets down?
Hereford-esque nail biting.
Let's not go there.
Except a lot less on the line!
And there's a good chance it won't be tense at all, if NZ get the lead up to 300, i'm not sure we'll chase it, given we're winning the series.
Also quite possible, given England's batting over the last few years that their quicks take early wickets and we succumb to the pressure and are finished off before Lunch