Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,656
I've got a mate who went to Trent Bridge today. He reckons it wasn't shitehouse.
Yes, when it works it is amazing but in this day and age an opposition team will work out a plan for Stokes if he wants to come out all guns blazing. By all means he should have a swing now and again but he needs to pick the right ball....not all six an over.....we had absolutely the same thing with KP...." That's the way I play " starts to wear a bit thin when clunking it to midwicket third ball time after time.Agree. But that is the way Stokes plays , and when it works it is amazing. If everyone in the top eight could chip in with a quick 40+ then things would be ok but he needs to read the game situation better . Don't think he will change
Yes, when it works it is amazing but in this day and age an opposition team will work out a plan for Stokes if he wants to come out all guns blazing. By all means he should have a swing now and again but he needs to pick the right ball....not all six an over.....we had absolutely the same thing with KP...." That's the way I play " starts to wear a bit thin when clunking it to midwicket third ball time after time.
Yes, when it works it is amazing but in this day and age an opposition team will work out a plan for Stokes if he wants to come out all guns blazing. By all means he should have a swing now and again but he needs to pick the right ball....not all six an over.....we had absolutely the same thing with KP...." That's the way I play " starts to wear a bit thin when clunking it to midwicket third ball time after time.
It wasn't third ball today though, was it? 46 off 33 balls. And the context being we're trying to introduce more positivity in both batting and bowling and this game is heading rapidly for a draw.
It wasn't third ball today though, was it? 46 off 33 balls. And the context being we're trying to introduce more positivity in both batting and bowling and this game is heading rapidly for a draw.
The intent was there quite early on though, KP is the prime example of trying to go off like a train before getting used to the pitch.... he's not going to get increasingly large scores by playing this way as the team bowling will know what to expect and put plans in place to combat it. For reference, England were 209 runs behind when Stokes came to the crease, if he had gone cheaply we could have been 5 down and still almost 200 behind with a weak tail that could crumble for 30-40 runs.... besides, there were obviously runs in the wicket playing conventionally even for Pope !
Not the time left to win the game though.
At the point in the game when Bairstow went cheaply it was one heck of a gamble to play a T20 innings...
Edit : especially when wickets can fall quickly and cheaply when pushing the scoring...like this morning.