Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?Really?
I'm not so sure.
Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?Really?
I'm not so sure.
And I didn't say you did.Please don’t put words in my mouth, I never said it was.
I have accused those who have chosen to make an issue out of Starmer’s son sitting his GCSEs in peace and being in a box after Arsenal moved him for security reasons so he could continue to watch games he pays to watch of faux outrage. Very different issues.
I was referring to WFA - so were you in the post I responded to.Please don’t put words in my mouth, I never said it was.
I have accused those who have chosen to make an issue out of Starmer’s son sitting his GCSEs in peace and being in a box after Arsenal moved him for security reasons so he could continue to watch games he pays to watch of faux outrage. Very different issues.
There's only one person who seems to not really understand the impacts of this, and it's not @Mellor 3 Ward 4Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?
Yes.Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?
The issue is, as you full well know, the huge number of pensioners entitled to pension credits who aren’t claiming them, who have outright relied on the WFA to keep the hearing on in winter. This figure is upwards of 800,000 people who are quite literally on the poverty line, and who absolutely depend on that money.Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?
And Conference voted against it yesterday....It’s heartless. It absolutely stinks and the only people I’ve seen even attempt to defend it are diehard Labour supporters (and statistically speaking even the majority of those are against it).
Yes, that’s why it’s continuing for those on pension credits. Have you actually read what the policy is?
It’s a good point and as I understand it the qualifying week for the allowance has now passed re this years payment…..or can they backdate the benefit?As much as I disagree with how they are implementing this, I believe the timing of the announcement was the right thing to do as...
1. It gave people an opportunity to see if they were able to access Pension Credits and, then, WFP before winter.
2. It allowed others some time to prepare and adjust knowing they were not going to be getting the payment.
Delaying the announcement until the end of October budget would have given almost no time for either of those.
Call him Jack …I’m alright JackYes.
My 87 year old mother in law is affected by it.
(Very) small private pension takes her over the threshold.
Oh, Guiness Boy - she put her heating on yesterday - is that OK with you?
Massive OG from the Labour Party as it is all people are talking about - and rightly so - and is just going to get worse and worse as it gets colder.
Considering they have been paying Sue Gray £170'000pa to prepare them for Government, if this is the quality of her output I'd be asking for the money back.
Absolutely. Those who glibly say that relatively poor and elderly people who are entitled to Pension Credits but not currently in receipt of them should 'just apply' over the next few weeks are utterly clueless.Have you actually looked at the process for applying for Pension Credits yourself? It’s really not a straightforward single form, it is a complicated process.
Now imagine you’re in your 80’s, living alone because of life partner has died. Imagine you, like the majority of very elderly people are not au-fait with online forms, can just about make it to the shops and post office, but have no clue how to even apply for Pension Credits. Let alone obtain the correct forms, fill them out and send them back along with the photocopies of supporting evidence they need.
All in the space of a few weeks before the temperatures drop.
Not sure what you're on about but WFP was paid from November onward and any bill sent NOW! won't have heating on.oh dear oh dear ....i guess it must be hard for you to accept all this ….have you tried therapy
Not sure what you're on about but WFP was paid from November onward and any bill sent NOW! won't have heating on.
I'm not in favour of the policy either unless accompanied by energy companies reducing tarifs for the elderly. Let's see what happens in the budget. But, for clarity, I'm not defending the policy, I'm pointing out your hyperbole.
After my father died, my mum's reduced income meant that she was entitled to Pension Credits. Blimey, they don't make it easy to claim. (Same as tax credits, PIP and other benefits.) My mum would never have been able to get the forms completed without my sister's help.The issue is, as you full well know, the huge number of pensioners entitled to pension credits who aren’t claiming them, who have outright relied on the WFA to keep the hearing on in winter. This figure is upwards of 800,000 people who are quite literally on the poverty line, and who absolutely depend on that money.
Springing this surprise cut late in the year to vulnerable people who absolutely need that money is abhorrent and typical more of “nasty Tories” than “for the people” Labour. It’s a nasty cut, horribly timed and with little care as to the harm it will cause. It’s Tory through and through.
Have you actually looked at the process for applying for Pension Credits yourself? It’s really not a straightforward single form, it is a complicated process.
Now imagine you’re in your 80’s, living alone because of life partner has died. Imagine you, like the majority of very elderly people are not au-fait with online forms, can just about make it to the shops and post office, but have no clue how to even apply for Pension Credits. Let alone obtain the correct forms, fill them out and send them back along with the photocopies of supporting evidence they need.
All in the space of a few weeks before the temperatures drop.
It’s heartless. It absolutely stinks and the only people I’ve seen even attempt to defend it are diehard Labour supporters (and statistically speaking even the majority of those are against it).
But at least it stops people talking about Starmer's free clobber and his inability to understand he can actually PAY for his corporate hospitality at the Emirates.Massive OG from the Labour Party as it is all people are talking about - and rightly so - and is just going to get worse and worse as it gets colder.
Considering they have been paying Sue Gray £170'000pa to prepare them for Government, if this is the quality of her output I'd be asking for the money back.
They're not quite the words I was thinking of to call Guinness Boy.Call him Jack …I’m alright Jack
I guess it depends on whether people want separate cheerleading and critiquing threads or have it all mashed together.
It's almost like a small clique or echo chamber are taking over threads and making the board unusable for others.It would certainly be an interesting Venn diagram of the cheerleaders and critics across the cheerleading and critiquing threads
View attachment 189408View attachment 189409