Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
]The Labour manifesto at the next election will be fully costed and viable to deliver. McDonnell's ideas about an "entrepreneurial state" are modern and exciting.
Thank God for the money tree.
]The Labour manifesto at the next election will be fully costed and viable to deliver. McDonnell's ideas about an "entrepreneurial state" are modern and exciting.
Jeremy Corbyn would use the 100s of billions of pounds earmarked for pointless nuclear weapons to pay for his programme. I would be in favour of that but I know it is not going to happen.
"How will it all be paid for?" is the most fundamental question in political planning. The Labour manifesto at the next election will be fully costed and viable to deliver. McDonnell's ideas about an "entrepreneurial state" are modern and exciting.
(Not going to spend much time on NSC today ... ).
If only
Keeping it simple.
People on the left advocate a society where opportunity is more fairly distributed. They have a viable proposal for how to deliver this. It includes provision of high quality state education based on decades of sustained high investment and development of a coherent system based on equality of opportunity for all.
Thanks to the Tories this fairer society and more equal education system is periodically set back a couple of decades either by underfunding or elitist dogma. We currently find ourselves nowhere near the state education system advocated by the left - and this is thanks to the Tories. Why should the children of Labour MPs pay the price for Tory incompetence? I am perfectly happy for my Labour MP's children to attend the best school available to them under the current system - provided that MP continues to fight tooth and claw for change in that system to the future benefit of all.
Please sir, can I have my cake and eat it?
And finally - once again - it is extremely revealing that Tories spend so much time focused on this personalised stuff at the moment. Why aren't you talking about the Tories' record on education and their future plans...?
interesting, because the official Labour policy is to renew Trident. the "how it will be paid for" is being answered by "borrow lots of money". there is nothing from McDonnell on how this will be paid for, assuming there is unspecified tax rises in the future to cover the £250bn and all the other as yet undeclared spending that will be borrowed.
You could not make this up. Abbott has just said on TV that if her son was young again he would absolutely send him to state school because schools are much better now. No selective private school her her kids if she has any. She is a complete liar in my view. The news also went through labour inner circle who send their kids to private school or selective schools whilst against grammer schools (for other people, not themselves). Lord falconer kids to private schools (but ok as he said it wasnt a grammer school). Shamus mills kids to grammar schools. Emily thornbury sent them to a selective school. Shami Chatribati kid apparently applying to Easton. They are just nasty hypocrites
I doubt May wants one. Why not wait and beat Corbyn in a few years and get to be in power even longer?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because they are so far a head they could get themselves a much better working majority in the house and therefore not have to rely on 'dissident' tories to push through legislation. If they wait, there is the possibility they could **** up somewhere or the economy takes a downward turn and they get the blame for that. Best example is Brown. He dithered about calling an election when they were ahead, economy crashed, he got the blame and that could have been the last labour government we'll see for a very long time!
I am aware of that, but Corbyn isn't going to start being electable and he is there to stay. It is rare, though, for the party of government to increase their majority in the house.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because they are so far a head they could get themselves a much better working majority in the house and therefore not have to rely on 'dissident' tories to push through legislation. If they wait, there is the possibility they could **** up somewhere or the economy takes a downward turn and they get the blame for that. Best example is Brown. He dithered about calling an election when they were ahead, economy crashed, he got the blame and that could have been the last labour government we'll see for a very long time!
Needs vote no confidence in governmentHold it,May as i understand can't call an election as it,s a fixed term parliament,however i do believe it,s not set in stone ?
Neither can I. And hasn't May said we'll have Brexit before an election anyway? - no election, no second referendum.Needs vote no confidence in government
Or
2/3 to vote for early election
Tories won't vote for 1. Labour voting for 2 would be like turkeys voting for early Christmas.
Can't see it happening.