The Islamic Future of Britain

[El Presidente]

No you dont like facts idiot,you are just like those scumbags in Rotherham that were scared to say it was MUSLIM gangs rapeing kids.Hideing it under the name Asian when everyone knows its MUSLIMS.

You call someone an idiot..............and you can't even spell raping?

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

Make me **** off..Idiot

bye bye.

You're clearly someone who has to have the last word. So, I know how frustrated you will now be given I can post this, plus further posts about your ignorance, and you now have no ability to reply.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

You call someone an idiot..............and you can't even spell raping?

Or hiding, and it's.

 

[El Presidente]

Yes, those all those countries have known is poverty, violence and war. Why don't you make the correlation between those things, rather than discriminate against a population that spans half the hemisphere and over a billion people?

The things you are saying are ignorant, but also really quite offensive.

But given the person making the comments is both ignorant and offensive, the comments are quite apt.

 

[Wozza]

Breaking: David Haines beheaded by Isis. :-(

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Muslims raped over 300 Swedish children and 700 women in first 7 months of 2013 TIP OF THE ICEBERG as 90 percent of them go unreported
In the first seven months of 2013, over 1,000 Swedish women reported being raped by Muslim immigrants in the capital city of Stockholm. Over 300 of those were under the age of 15. The number of rapes is up 16% so far this year compared to 2012 numbers. A large proportion of the increase include rape of young [pre-teen] girls. [Bing translated]

The official radio report quoted from BRÅ (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention) refuses to mention the M-word in the socialist-suffocated Sweden, a country held hostage by the extreme left. But when you contact senior police and government sources they confirm (anonymous in fear of losing their jobs) that these numbers represent Muslims. And a majority of these rapes and sexual assaults are caused by Malmström’s new arrivals, the asylum seekers.

Fear of losing their jobs...sounds a bit like Rotherham

The only sources of that info I can find is from the EDL, the Polish Defence League and a Facebook group called 'Ban the Burkha'.

Is there somewhere else that can verify those claims?

 

[Luke93]

Muslims raped over 300 Swedish children and 700 women in first 7 months of 2013 TIP OF THE ICEBERG as 90 percent of them go unreported
In the first seven months of 2013, over 1,000 Swedish women reported being raped by Muslim immigrants in the capital city of Stockholm. Over 300 of those were under the age of 15. The number of rapes is up 16% so far this year compared to 2012 numbers. A large proportion of the increase include rape of young [pre-teen] girls. [Bing translated]

The official radio report quoted from BRÅ (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention) refuses to mention the M-word in the socialist-suffocated Sweden, a country held hostage by the extreme left. But when you contact senior police and government sources they confirm (anonymous in fear of losing their jobs) that these numbers represent Muslims. And a majority of these rapes and sexual assaults are caused by Malmström’s new arrivals, the asylum seekers.

Fear of losing their jobs...sounds a bit like Rotherham

Rape isn't exclusive to Muslims. Every ethnic group has its scumbags.

 

[StonehamPark]

Rape isn't exclusive to Muslims. Every ethnic group has its scumbags.

Correct. Though you must remember that the treatment of Muslim women is appalling compared to our standards.
I only know of one 'book' that condones the sexual slavery of women.

 

[wellquickwoody]

Breaking: David Haines beheaded by Isis. :-(

The Guardian is reporting this.

 

[Goldstone1976]

I only know of one 'book' that condones the sexual slavery of women.

That would be the Holy Bible, I presume?

Exodus 21: 7-8. "If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do. If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself,he must let her be redeemed...."

Thank goodness that the Bible is the "only book" that can be interpreted as condoning sexual slavery. Can you imagine the reaction from the anti-muslim brigade if they thought that the only holy book that could be interpreted as condoning sexual slavery was the Koran? I mean, we'd never hear the end of it, would we?

 

[SuperFurrySeagull]

Back to the original theme of this thread: At the time Elvis Presley died in 1977, he had 150 impersonators in the US. Now there are 85,000. Intriguingly, that means one in every 3,400 Americans is an Elvis impersonator. More disturbingly, if Elvis impersonators continue multiplying at the same rate, they will account for a third of the world’s population by 2019.

 

[StonehamPark]

That would be the Holy Bible, I presume?

Exodus 21: 7-8. "If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do. If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself,he must let her be redeemed...."

Thank goodness that the Bible is the "only book" that can be interpreted as condoning sexual slavery. Can you imagine the reaction from the anti-muslim brigade if they thought that the only holy book that could be interpreted as condoning sexual slavery was the Koran? I mean, we'd never hear the end of it, would we?

Old Testament dear. The one which was replaced/updated many years ago in keeping with more modern times.
The Quran is the only current book which condones sexual slavery to its followers.

If we all followed the Old Testament, we'd be stoning our kids every time they swear and executing the vertically challenged.

Keep up.

 

[Goldstone1976]

Old Testament dear. The one which was replaced/updated many years ago in keeping with more modern times.
The Quran is the only current book which condones sexual slavery to its followers.

If we all followed the Old Testament, we'd be stoning our kids every time they swear and executing the vertically challenged.

Keep up.

I was waiting for that response.

You might like to tell the Archbishop of Canterbury and the whole of the Church of England that the Old testament has been "replaced/updated many years ago".


"In the choice of readings other than the Gospel reading, the
minister should ensure that, in any year, a balance is maintained
between readings from the Old and New Testaments"

https://www.churchofengland.org/media/41133/mvlectionary524-591.pdf

I'm afraid you're just plain wrong. The Old Testament is an integral part of the current Holy Bible. I know you won't admit it, because that would totally defeat your argument.

 

[StonehamPark]

I was waiting for that response.

You might like to tell the Archbishop of Canterbury and the whole of the Church of England that the Old testament has been "replaced/updated many years ago".


"In the choice of readings other than the Gospel reading, the
minister should ensure that, in any year, a balance is maintained
between readings from the Old and New Testaments"

https://www.churchofengland.org/media/41133/mvlectionary524-591.pdf

Did you read exactly what you've just posted??

"A balance is maintained between readings..."

Meaning bits and pieces are taken from both books in keeping with modern times. It's not difficult.

I'm not sure why you're trying to drag me off topic in a very clumsy way, but my original point still stands. Quran condoning sexual slavery etc etc.

Anticipating your last word.

 

[Goldstone1976]

Did you read exactly what you've just posted??

"A balance is maintained between readings..."

Meaning bits and pieces are taken from both books in keeping with modern times. It's not difficult.

I'm not sure why you're trying to drag me off topic in a very clumsy way, but my original point still stands. Quran condoning sexual slavery etc etc.

Anticipating your last word.

I was not trying to drag you off topic. I was rebutting your point that the Koran is the only book that condones sexual slavery. It is not - the Bible does too.

My last post was in response to you saying "Old Testament dear. The one which was replaced/updated many years ago ", which is, of course, rubbish, as the link to the CofE's website proves.

You are in a hole. I'd stop digging if I were you.

 

[StonehamPark]

I was not trying to drag you off topic. I was rebutting your point that the Koran is the only book that condones sexual slavery. It is not - the Bible does too.

My last post was in response to you saying "Old Testament dear. The one which was replaced/updated many years ago ", which is, of course, rubbish, as the link to the CofE's website proves.

You are in a hole. I'd stop digging if I were you.

I'll make it as simple as possible.

Many parts of the Old Testament are updated and no longer followed.
E.g stoning of children for swearing, killing the vertically challenged, yada, yada yada.

The New Testament was written as an 'update' to the old one and doesn't include some of the older/outdated teachings.

The Quran condones sexual slavery. The Quran has not (and likely never will be) updated.
These ill practices that are written are most likely practiced by Muslims over the world.

I don't think there's a debate to be had.

We both know the Quran condones sexual slavery and we both know that the New Testament does not.
We also both know that many of the old testaments teachings are out dated and many are not followed in today's age.

Please let's leave it at that as I'm typing on my iPad and it's a fu**ing ball ache.

 

[Soulman]

Make me **** off? Oh FFS I really am logging off now. We're not in the playground for Christ's sake although you seemingly belong there.

eleven minutes past 12 and you still have not logged off after this post at 22.06.

 

[Eggmundo]

I was not trying to drag you off topic. I was rebutting your point that the Koran is the only book that condones sexual slavery. It is not - the Bible does too.

My last post was in response to you saying "Old Testament dear. The one which was replaced/updated many years ago ", which is, of course, rubbish, as the link to the CofE's website proves.

You are in a hole. I'd stop digging if I were you.

I suppose it comes down to how you were taught the meaning of the religious doctrine you follow/inherited/deny.
I was raised C of E and can categorically say I have never been told sexual slavery is an acceptable practice. Nor was I molested by a priest.

I have never seen a member of the religion I follow/inherited/deny lop some blokes head off and say it is justifiable either.

But that's just the 'bad ones'.

 

[GreersElbow]

Rape isn't exclusive to Muslims. Every ethnic group has its scumbags.

Proportionality is key to arguing this, unfortunately that doesn't hold up well when you look at the figures....

 

[Biscuit]

Atheism is the Future of Britain,

Matter of time before everyone has enough of all the bullshit done in religions name.