Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,262
The counties having a T20 team each rather than an 8 team short period tournament has set our test player production back. Counties have prioritises producing players for T20, players have a choice of 18 teams and it’s well paid plus then getting picked up for other tournaments.
Ideally counties needed to be 4 day and 1 day competitions. T20 should be an IPL-like separate tournament a.k.a the hundred experiment.
I agree. The problem is that 4-day / test cricket is a very different animal to one-day cricket, yet the counties can only afford to employ a certain amount of cricketers. Therefore, they will prioritise where the money is - one-day cricket - and recruit accordingly. Yet the only thing kids play is the short format of 20 / 40 overs a side.
There is no longer any kudos in winning the 4-day County Championship either, and there is a lack of coverage of results and county action. It is shunted and shoe-horned into the wettest and coldest parts of the season too.
Personally, I have a real problem supporting the thing that is 'Southern Brave' where all the matches are played in Hampshire and none in Sussex. It's not even the best players from both counties; I see a bloke from Lancashire and a mercenary from New Zealand have done the business for Southern Brave tonight, but they'll probably lose in the Final to a masterclass from Sussex's own Luke Wright, who is somehow playing for the Trent Rockets.
Last edited: