But there were several posts earlier wondering why there wasn't any journalism relating to this story, and deploring badly translated spanish reports. Well there's someone over there on the local paper doing all of this. The Argus , having read NSC for years but first time poster !, gets unfairly hard time on here. Worth celebrating it when it does a good job. With Vicente its been pretty good.
I think that was mostly me, thank you for clarifying. Though, since so few people seemed to be aware of this, it makes me question what some people are basing their views on.
Agent says Vicente will miss training From The Argus)
Not looking good
I don't remember if I said it on this thread or one of the other vicente ones, but I would be more worried if he did show up. Not showing up for training is a power play in response to the club's power play of activating the second year clause. It's all negotiation and I'm not reading anything into his absence other than his side flexing their muscles to show the club may have activated the clause, but vicente and his team aren't going to kowtow to the clubs wishes in this negotiation. I'd have viewed him showing up as a sign of not caring about negotiations going forward because it was all about the exit and not about needing to show them he had a good position at the negotiation.
Point one is that Vicente owes Brighton nothing and as for comments for loyalty, he was an employee of ours for just under one year. That doesn't make him a lifelong supporter.
With regard to the comments on contract, yes he signed a one year contract with an option to extend. It was very clear in the press, and no doubt reporters can substantiate when GP said what he did, that BHA were not going to invoke that extension if Vicented didn't want that. As far as I am aware, that is not a hearsay comment and hasn't been denied. On that basis, a court may well find in favour of Vicente, who would argue that if he did not want to come back he would be free to talk to other clubs. Unfortunately this appears another mismanagement of contracts by the club. What they should have done is invoked the extension straight away and then offer to negotiate a new contract, rather than the other way around. Vicente would not have got ideas in his head that he could go elsewhere and would probably be, at this moment, on a route march over the south downs with the rest of the squad!!!
I agree with the first sentence, but
Gus doesn't have any legal authority in contracts, so his claim he wouldn't stand in his way wasn't legally binding, no court would side with vicente on that basis.
If the claim was that they wouldn't activate the clause if vicente didn't want it, them being 90-95% in agreement would indicate he had shown interest in staying another year, given them reason to believe he wanted it and so again, courts wouldn't side with vicente on that basis.