Totally agree, they’re the sort who mock people for buying supermarket value range, can’t bear em.
To a point you are correct. However, on occasions I would not eat in there, and would happily pay a little more as I don't want to share my dining experience with the drunks who have been parked in there from opening time. They offer decent food and drink at not bad value. However, such value can sometimes come at a cost. That's not being snobby at all.
I can’t say I’ve ever seen a value range in Waitrose but I wouldn’t mock anyone for buying it.
I can’t say I’ve ever seen a value range in Waitrose but I wouldn’t mock anyone for buying it.
Waitrose Essentials. Great value and usually good quality too.
You actually believed he shops in Waitrose [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
Went out to a Turkish restaurant near us in Hove last night called Sini. All tables were either outside or just inside open bi-fold doors. Also very busy. Starters and mains for all the family plus a couple of soft drinks each and it came to just over £10 a head with the discount. Going to book a garden table at a local pub for next week as I could get used to this cheap eating.
I never mentioned Spoons in my post.
What would you class as pretentious food?
An addition to my earlier reply to your post.
Having just read a story on the Argus website about a young Kayaker who lost his life this week it might be that the staff ar the Six restaurant may have other things on their minds. The man who died ran this restaurant and other businesses in Brighton and Hove with his brother.
I since noticed that too and it might have offered a reasonable explanation, however I do not think that was the case given their response when the young lady rang them to challenge them about it.
Had it been the case they could have simply offered this explanation and amended their mistake.
They however told her that the government instructions were not to offer the discount to everyone as they might not want it. He then said something about people might want to claim VAT back (presumably if being put through as a business expense). This made no sense as any VAT reclaimable would be at 20% which would be less than the 50% discount, and in any case the 20% VAT could still be reclaimable by those who wished to do so on the discounted price.
So although the tragedy associated with that restaurant might have offered an understandable excuse, the manner in which they responded and the reasons they gave when challenged by the young lady did not suggest that was remotely the case. They simply refused to amend their "mistake" on a false pretext.
I think the government have been very poor during the pandemic but this is one thing they’ve done well on.
Everywhere in central Brighton into Hove was thriving last night. The nature of the saving is encouraging people to stay for drinks afterwards as well, going by the crowds.
I can’t say I’ve ever seen a value range in Waitrose but I wouldn’t mock anyone for buying it.
I can’t say I’ve ever seen a value range in Waitrose but I wouldn’t mock anyone for buying it.
It's called 'Essentials' and some of the products are .... well .... anything but 'Essential' .... unless you consider mussels in a white wine sauce 'Essential'.
I since noticed that too and it might have offered a reasonable explanation, however I do not think that was the case given their response when the young lady rang them to challenge them about it.
Had it been the case they could have simply offered this explanation and amended their mistake.
They however told her that the government instructions were not to offer the discount to everyone as they might not want it. He then said something about people might want to claim VAT back (presumably if being put through as a business expense). This made no sense as any VAT reclaimable would be at 20% which would be less than the 50% discount, and in any case the 20% VAT could still be reclaimable by those who wished to do so on the discounted price.
So although the tragedy associated with that restaurant might have offered an understandable excuse, the manner in which they responded and the reasons they gave when challenged by the young lady did not suggest that was remotely the case. They simply refused to amend their "mistake" on a false pretext.
Plus, from the 15th of July the VAT rate on eat-in food & soft drinks together with hot carry-out food dropped to 5% until the 12th of January 2021
If you really want details there is - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/food-products-and-vat-notice-70114