nicko31
Well-known member
Johnson doesnt upset me. Just makes me laugh at the halfwits defending his lying.
But they think it upsets you, so they go with the lie and become victims.
Johnson doesnt upset me. Just makes me laugh at the halfwits defending his lying.
Anyone would think they're getting desperate. I guess this means I can never run for PM given I don't either.
[TWEET]1202205653701447680[/TWEET]
Anyone would think they're getting desperate. I guess this means I can never run for PM given I don't either.
[TWEET]1202205653701447680[/TWEET]
Wonder if the owners of the Telegraph will be able to watch the Queen's speech from Monaco?
Any evidence at all would be a start because you've posted zero corroboration so far. However, if it's from your "alternative news sources" about Venezuela then I genuinely wouldn't bother. While you're at it though, would you mind explaining what you're doing on a football message board when every single one of your posts so far, bar one, has been on the political threads?
There is loads more i could post if you want- books, refernces, articles podcasts, whole you tube channels and MMT message boards - you name it.
The amazing thing about this is that he felt he couldn't be honest for fear of being pilloried and as a result will be done so anyway. He should have just said: "Of course I don't watch the ****ing Queen's Speech. I'm a republican, it's Christmas Day, I'm with my family, why the **** should I drop everything to listen to this old bat spout a load of bollox for another year?" You know, like 60 million-odd of the rest of the country.
Best 20/1 shot ever, I don't want any AFTER TIMERS on here a week on Friday
Yes, and I can give you evidence of it. Oh dear, and how do you think it works?
Ok me again just for starters here`s a couple you tube clips from Professor Stephanie Kelton who was economic advisor to Bernie Sanders and from Wikepedia :-
"Stephanie Kelton (née Bell; born October 10, 1969) is an American economist and Professor of Public Policy and Economics at Stony Brook University.[1] She was formerly Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri–Kansas City,[2] Chief Economist on the U.S. Senate Budget Committee 2015 minority party staff and an Economic Advisor to Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign. She is founder and editor-in-chief of the blog New Economic Perspectives. She is a leading proponent of Modern Monetary Theory,[3] was named in Current Affairs as a possible future secretary of the treasury,[4] and was named one of Politico's 50 "thinkers, doers and visionaries transforming American politics in 2016."[5][6] In fall 2019, she joined the board of Matriarch PAC.[7] "
So as another poster put it if i would make a good chancellor she could well be something like that on the other side of the pond.
1. With the hilarous piss-taker of the right , Jimmy Dore: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5baKgv7Zl5g
2. Brain washing poor students on the economics course at UCL.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6ss3p4jjI4
There is loads more i could post if you want- books, refernces, articles podcasts, whole you tube channels and MMT message boards - you name it. The thories have been developing for about 20 years.
So, in fact, you haven't proved how "it" - the current economic system - works at all. You posted an untested theory beloved of certain left wing figures likfe Bernie Sanders and a few economists.
Even basic research shows that MMT has been criticised as likely to generate hyperinflation (who'd think printing your own money would do that though? ) and would need central bank rates of zero maintained.
In other words, you are a left wing political shill posting a left wing economic theory that is totally unproven beyond papers and lecture theatres. So, in short, I agree with you. If you think untested theories and printing your own money are a good idea, vote Corbyn
Best 20/1 shot ever, I don't want any AFTER TIMERS on here a week on Friday
Is this Corbyns plan then?
McDonnell was flirting with it a couple of years ago, but seem to work out it was moody, then worked out an alternative of using debt instead.
McDonnell was flirting with it a couple of years ago, but seem to work out it was moody.....
At risk of what, exactly?Suggest it if you will but the suggestion would be ridiculous. Never (even when Michael Foot led The Labour Party) has anyone so dangerous and detrimental to the safety and security of this country come as close to the levers of power as Corbyn and McDonnell.
Dislike Boris all you like, call him a buffoon, a liar and a serial adulterer, but he would never put our country at risk as Labour 2019 would if they win a week tomorrow.
The amazing thing about this is that he felt he couldn't be honest for fear of being pilloried and as a result will be done so anyway. He should have just said: "Of course I don't watch the ****ing Queen's Speech. I'm a republican, it's Christmas Day, I'm with my family, why the **** should I drop everything to listen to this old bat spout a load of bollox for another year?" You know, like 60 million-odd of the rest of the country.
Suggest it if you will but the suggestion would be ridiculous. Never (even when Michael Foot led The Labour Party) has anyone so dangerous and detrimental to the safety and security of this country come as close to the levers of power as Corbyn and McDonnell.
Dislike Boris all you like, call him a buffoon, a liar and a serial adulterer, but he would never put our country at risk as Labour 2019 would if they win a week tomorrow.