You've managed to miss Matt Hancock then?
Which bit of "I'm not suggesting the Tories don't do the same" confused you?
You've managed to miss Matt Hancock then?
Probably a 'bubble' thing. All i ever seem to see is Kwarteng, Rees Mogg, Cleverly, Hancock or Johnson, himself making utter tits of themselves.
But of course I'm biased. And also inclined to think that the Labour Brexit position is pretty clear (negotiate a new, softer, deal that meets the Labour red lines and put it back to a referendum, against remain, within six months) and any journalist pretending that it's 'all so confusing' is either a bit dim or (mostly) trying to stir it up.
Maybe [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] didn't realise the Kier Starmer video had been doctored by the Tories (and now it seems the BBC are doing the job for them)?
The argument for privatising was always that private ventures could run services more efficiently than public. As that's been proven to be shite, we should bring them back to public ownership.
thats one argument, to sell the idea, which has some merit. other reasons for privatisation are shifting investment cost off the state, and allow the industry and commercial sectors that use the services to guide what they need. on evidence its a very mixed bag, results being very different from rail to telecoms.
i always wonder what people think will be achieved by nationalisation. it seems largely ideological or based on misconceptions. rail wont be cheaper unless heavily subsidised.
I passed a group of Brexiters displaying posters and banners and handing out leaflets in a Sussex village High Street on Saturday morning and I wondered why they were there. Arundel and South Downs has a 24,000 Tory majority - although some polls are show the LibDems, a poor third last time, closing in dramatically - and narrowly voted Remain in the referendum. The only possible effect of the Brexit Party is to increase the slender chance of a LibDem upset. I wish them well.
I admire their sense of participation too. The Times this morning says that the Brexit Party should stand down to allow the Tories to sweep home. Patronising garbage. If voters are intelligent and discerning people (and we are assured they are) then the greater the choice the better. It is marker of these revolting times that a respected newspaper should be demanding that people with an entirely legal set of beliefs should be denied a party to vote for, all on the grounds of expediency.
Costs up, quality down. Been a disaster really
[TWEET]1193913677818318851[/TWEET]
There's a bit of the bleedin' obvious going on here. Read my post again. It specifically queried why the Brexit Party were standing in a Tory-held seat when the only beneficiary was likely to be the LibDems, an outcome I made clear I welcomed. Where's the dishonesty?
And I stand by my charge of patronising garbage - The Times was effectively saying that supporters of a hard Brexit won't have the wit to vote tactically in Tory-held seats and so, just to be on the safe side, should have their ideal choice removed from them altogether.
Boris - having got his majority - then chose to dissolve Parliament himself. Parliament merely objected to the tight timescale for voting on his Withdrawal Agreement. He could have kept it going, given Parliament the time they were requesting, then had the vote, won it and then Brexited on / before 31 Jan 20.
A weak reply and I think you probably know that..........if you are honest with yourself.
Anyway, things have moved on now!
P.S. I loved Footy Genius's reply to your post. You really are full of 'humbug!......done up like a kipper!
Farage’s big move ‘will make little difference’, says YouGov expert
Chris Curtis, YouGov’s political research manager, has poured cold water on suggestions Nigel Farage has swun the election for Boris Johnson and the Tories.
In a blog post titled ‘Farage’s election stand-down will make little difference’, he points out that the Brexit Party was already trending downwards in the polls.
“The most important swing to look at in the polls is the one between Labour and the Conservatives. Despite a move away from two-party politics since the last election, it is still the case that most marginal seats are battles between Labour and the Conservatives, and this is the most important dynamic in deciding who will be celebrating Christmas in 10 Downing Street.”
He concludes: “So overall, despite today’s drama, this is unlikely to be a game-changing moment.”
Clutching at straws Mikey, the betting markets don't see it that way, now 1-2 for a conservative majority and 20-1 ON for the most seats
hey mikey what's your take on thisWhat straws are being clutched at by pasting the opinion of a YouGov expert?
As I have been saying, anything other than a Tory Majority equals a Labour Minority Gov.
He's such a duplicitous slimy **** it's unreal.
hey mikey what's your take on this
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49798197
from the biased Beeb
regards
DF
no not at all, as i keep saying the silent majority on the march to the ballot box , reap what you sow RIP ZOMBIE PARLIAMENTWhat happened to that 16% lead?
Quite please with the progress as it happens
"Signs of a Labour recovery have also become firmer." Labour minority gov - you must be wetting yourself