Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] The General Election Thread

How are you voting?

  • Conservative and Unionist Party

    Votes: 176 32.3%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 146 26.8%
  • Liberal Democrat’s

    Votes: 139 25.5%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 44 8.1%
  • Independent Candidate

    Votes: 4 0.7%
  • Monster Raving Looney Party

    Votes: 7 1.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 29 5.3%

  • Total voters
    545
  • Poll closed .


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
She been caught for telling lies, she is the correct qualifications for a Johnson cabinet, Little Miss Smug is going nowhere

Where's Ester McClueless by the way, not a peep from her in weeks?

Down a mine in South Wales with Rees mogg and Abbott.
 




knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
13,109
No politics on the running thread. That's the LAW :thumbsup:

Besides, a good debate should never get in the way of a friendship. My regular poker group includes a couple of Tories and an Extinction Rebellion member, We all get along fine.

However, my dislike of Corbyn has not much to do with scruffiness, nor will I enjoy Boris for one second. In fact, that's my point. Labour's uselessness has handed the keys of number 10 to a pontificating prevaricator, of whom Ken Clarke said "he couldn't run a whelk stall". I'm angry with Labour. I'm not particularly against them. Nemeth has certainly shown his true colours in this campaign. It seems the Eco Warrior act only lasts as long as he wants to sell organic honey to prosecco soaked mummies.

I'm tetchy and knocky as lingering man flu and breathing probs has stopped me running and I've got to go to Croydon IKEA this morning. Ignore me for a few days.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,778
I understand your position, but there isn't an equivalence there. Johnson with a majority will have license to ruin this country, whereas Corbyn never will.

You're stating opinion as fact.

The reason many won't vote for Corbyn is they believe he WILL ruin this country in a way Johnson won't.

(Note: I don't suscribe to either view)

But, in order for Corbyn to 'ruin the country' he would need to get a majority, and surely only the most extreme (from both wings) are claiming, or believing that might happen.

In order for Johnson 'to ruin the country' he would need to get a majority, something which is likely at the moment.

For this reason I would be a bit more concerned about the latter than the former and if I have read his post correctly, think KG may well have a point.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,025
Down a mine in South Wales with Rees mogg and Abbott.

must be a very cramped mine, quite a few normally vocal politicians have been hidden this campaign.
 


jimhigham

Je Suis Rhino
Apr 25, 2009
8,043
Woking
Looking increasingly like how bigger majority the Tories are going to get, could even be close to 100.

Where is it increasingly looking like that? The MRP poll that came out last night, with a sample size of around 100,000 had the majority down from 68 a week or so ago to 28.
 








WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,778
Wrong again I'm afraid. Hove and Portslade is one of those seats that has been held by Labour and the Tories over the years and that is because in general the people of the area vote for a person not a party. Indeed, some of Kyle's leaflets this election don't even mention the Labour Party. People are voting for him because he's a good MP not because he's 'Labour'. Hell, I'm right of centre and I voted for him last time because of his record as our MP. I've decided this time not to, with some regret, because I don't want the risk of Corbyn getting in. Last time it seemed unlikely that would happen.

You think there is a risk of Corbyn getting a majority ?
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,559
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Not sure it's been a vintage morning for the PM...

[TWEET]1204663278233935872[/TWEET]

[TWEET]1204689322487799808[/TWEET]
 


Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,453
Central Borneo / the Lizard
You're stating opinion as fact.

The reason many won't vote for Corbyn is they believe he WILL ruin this country in a way Johnson won't.

(Note: I don't suscribe to either view)

Corbyn cannot ruin (or dramatically improve) this country, because he cannot win an overall majority. Johnson can ruin (or dramatically improve) this country, because he can clearly get an overall majority.

If you subscribe to a 'plague on both their houses' point of view (as does the poster I was replying to), the hung parliament outcome should be infinitely preferable.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,311
Back in Sussex
Corbyn cannot ruin (or dramatically improve) this country, because he cannot win an overall majority. Johnson can ruin (or dramatically improve) this country, because he can clearly get an overall majority.

If you subscribe to a 'plague on both their houses' point of view (as does the poster I was replying to), the hung parliament outcome should be infinitely preferable.

Fair enough - I interpreted your post as Corbyn wouldn't ruin the country if he had a majority, and it's my opinion that a lot of people (wrongly) believe he will.
 








Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,354
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
I'm tetchy and knocky as lingering man flu and breathing probs has stopped me running and I've got to go to Croydon IKEA this morning. Ignore me for a few days.

I wouldn't wish Croydon IKEA on Boris Johnson :lol:

Get well soon.
 








Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,453
Central Borneo / the Lizard
That's called remaining........................

Don't be daft. These threads are supposed to be for intelligent debate, not soundbites.

If I was offered a version of leave where we stayed tightly aligned on standards to enable frictionless trade and be able to negotiate international trade deals as a block with the EU, had freedom of movement for Irish and UK citizens and goods across the NI border, could control the ability of non UK citizens to work and live in the UK, could impose higher taxation on tech companies and other large conglomerates within the UK, could impose greater restrictions on fish catches in UK waters to better control overfishing, would develop our own better version of the CAP to ensure sustainable farming, then I could support that.

It's probably just another unicorn version of leave, we'd have to see the details.
 


Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,453
Central Borneo / the Lizard
You know he could run a minority government or even a coalition yes ?

And would be able to do what exactly that would 'ruin' the country? If you believe that renationalisation would be a disaster, that wouldn't happen. If you think that tax rises on high earners would be bad, it wouldn't happen or be toned down. Trident won't be scrapped, we'll keep our international commitments.

What they will be able to do is increase funding into NHS and education, make proper commitments for affordable housing and social care, reverse other austerity policies, and yes, negotiate a softer brexit and put it back to the people. Obviously that last one is a sticking point for some people. But he wouldn't be able to impose his so - called 'socialist Marxist manifesto' on us.

Not least because the likes of Kyle, and there are many similar in the Labour Party, wouldn't let him, nor would the libdems, nor would the NI parties. Indeed there is more likely to be a Johnson led hung parliament than a Corbyn one. Johnson may not get support for his brexit deal from the DUP or any rebels that get elected like Grieve or Gauke, but those people are going to vote with the Conservatives on everything else.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,559
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Don't be daft. These threads are supposed to be for intelligent debate, not soundbites.

If I was offered a version of leave where we stayed tightly aligned on standards to enable frictionless trade and be able to negotiate international trade deals as a block with the EU, had freedom of movement for Irish and UK citizens and goods across the NI border, could control the ability of non UK citizens to work and live in the UK, could impose higher taxation on tech companies and other large conglomerates within the UK, could impose greater restrictions on fish catches in UK waters to better control overfishing, would develop our own better version of the CAP to ensure sustainable farming, then I could support that.

It's probably just another unicorn version of leave, we'd have to see the details.

I'm 95% sure we could do all that under EFTA, but I'm likely wrong as it's not my strong point.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here