theonlymikey
New member
- Apr 21, 2016
- 789
[tweet]1201092865633505280[/tweet]
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Hung Parliament territory
[tweet] 1200824832042164225[/tweet]
Well 'as a committed remainer' you must be aware that, according to everyone with experience of negotiating trade deals, this 'fast Brexit' that you want will take at least another 10 years (or 50 years if you believe Leader of the House JRM)
I completely agree. Get it done fast: just revoke it.
The Labour biased Telegraph is now reporting the expected Tory majority being slashed from 80 to 12 in a week.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...redicted-commons-majority-slashed-80-12-week/
Where is the NSC ‘house’ poll-of-polls to balance this up?
Yes , but we will have left the EU and will be operating under the withdrawal agreement which means that, in the interim period at least, we can trade reasonably normal. I agree, sorting out a long term trade deal will take years. Don't get me wrong, I think leaving at all is economic madness but we cant carry on as we are - either leave immediately or revoke immediately.
Revoke, for me personally, would be first choice and if the country gave the Lib Dems a majority then I think that would give revocation legitimacy. However that isn't going to happen. So we are faced with leaving the EU a few weeks after the election or starting another process of renegotiation with the EU and another referendum which will also take far far longer than the politicians claim. If the country votes leave again then we will be in the same mess as we are now and no further forward.
Maybe its just wanting something new to talk about but we have to move forward!
The interim period (as I pointed out previously of 10-50 years) where we stick to all EU rules and regulations, continue paying fully into the EU and have no input whatsoever to any of it ?
So exactly the same as at present but with no input for our investment whatsoever. You mean that interim period
Or carry on as we are with full control and power of veto, with the significant input of one of the biggest powers in the EU into any rules and regulations.
Well I can certainly see why you think the first scenario is the best way 'to move forward' for the next 10-50 years
My business trades with customers in various EU nations (and the US) and we are completely paralysed at the moment. The day we actually leave we can resume trade and we are all (us and our customers) ready to go. We'd all rather be permanently in, but the current limbo land is damaging us all. But, hey, what do I know?
Johnson generally tried to not answer questions. Marr had to continually to tell him to answer the question. Johnson just tried to turn it on to Labour and brexit. What Johnson didn't like was when he started quoting facts and data about the conservatives last terms in government. Johnson states a lie. Marr quotes facts with official data and shows Johnson is talking BS.
Facebook ban Tory add after BBC complaint.
The Tory’s had rejected the BBC complaint previously.
The Tories: Such a bunch of nasty lying ****s.