You've lost me I'm afraid , merely pointing out that you were wrong on Farage's response.
He said that Corbyn is the better debater. Bearing in mind they were debating that says it all.
You could change your name to FactCheck?
You've lost me I'm afraid , merely pointing out that you were wrong on Farage's response.
Wait, Corbyn was in charge of Venezuela? You’d think he’d put that on his cv.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
About the debate yes. As a human being and politician Johnson is a serial liar and everyone knows this. Objectively as someone who definitely won't vote Tory and probably won't vote Labour I thought Corbyn won the debate. I wouldn't have said it was a disaster for Johnson though who came through more or less unscathed which is all he needs to do.
Ok -you are trying to steer a more objective line, but I would question how you know that everybody knows he is a serial liar, if indeed he is.
Does that really strike you as a sensible reply?
“On his decision to postpone a planned fall in UK corporation tax from 19% to 17%, Mr Johnson claimed it was “already the lowest in Europe”.
But Ireland, for example, has a rate of 12.5%, according to statistics from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).” BBC
Ok -you are trying to steer a more objective line, but I would question how you know that everybody knows he is a serial liar, if indeed he is.
With Broadband and TV etc why is Virgin not available in Haywards Heath it is not as if it is out in the wilds.
He has been publicly sacked for lying, twice.
He lied to a father in a hospital corridor, by saying there was no press there, in front of the press.
There is evidence galore of things he said a couple of years ago, and now says the complete opposite.
'if indeed he is' I don't understand how you can even start to question it.
He has been publicly sacked for lying, twice.
He lied to a father in a hospital corridor, by saying there was no press there, in front of the press.
There is evidence galore of things he said a couple of years ago, and now says the complete opposite.
'if indeed he is' I don't understand how you can even start to question it.
*falls over in surprise*
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He said he'd die in a ditch. He said he wouldn't prorogue parliament. He said we would leave on the 31st over 40 times publicly. He is a pathological liar at best. Hastings Gull is a WUM at best.
He said he'd die in a ditch. He said he wouldn't prorogue parliament. He said we would leave on the 31st over 40 times publicly. He is a pathological liar at best. Hastings Gull is a WUM at best.
Does that really strike you as a sensible reply?
Is that really the best you can do?
It was the only one your statement merited. Venezuela is fairly unique. What about the more successful progressive policies in the Nordics?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
*falls over in surprise*
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk