Which is utter bollocks in reality because there are many areas of this country (some you would be very surprised about) where if there are any providers there are only one.You know why your broadband gets faster all the time?
Because there is a free market and competition.
As soon as Sky can offer you 10GB download speeds, Virgin work to offer you 20GB. Then sky work to go faster. & Cheaper.
A government monopoly in the provision of broadband will result in quality decreasing, cost increasing, and fewer and fewer people having access.
The government cannot provide products and services only the market place can.
Today, if your broadband breaks down you phone your supplier and they want to keep your business, so solving your problem matters to them.
Good luck when you have to phone the government's broadband department because you have a problem.
Labour are ridiculous.
That's amusing. Now you're voting for the party with the most extreme views concerning the implementation of the nation's decision at the referendum.Lib Dems for me as a remainer I think. Can't vote for the extreme of either mainstream party.
However, there’s very little doubting your last sentence. It’s spot on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So the answer is no you don't oppose government subsidies to private companies in all circumstances.
Depends if providing subsidies to private companies to encourage/incentivise them to roll out super high-speed broadband at a much faster rate including to non/less profitable rural areas is a better more affordable option than having the state do it.
No I don't oppose all subsidies. I do oppose them in the telecom sector. If they're reliant on public money and the public can get it cheaper long term, then it's a good idea, non?
Which is utter bollocks in reality because there are many areas of this country (some you would be very surprised about) where if there are any providers there are only one.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
That's amusing. Now you're voting for the party with the most extreme views concerning the implementation of some of the nation's votes in the corrupted advisory referendum.
Do you wonder why that is ??. Why don't any of the other providers exist or run their own networks out to rural areas ??. Surprisingly it costs 100,000s of pounds. which none of them apart from BT are prepared to invest.
Which is utter bollocks in reality because there are many areas of this country (some you would be very surprised about) where if there are any providers there are only one.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
Suggestions that flammable cladding involved in the Bolton student fires. Ooops. How will Tories spin this one?
[tweet]1195611042715447297[/tweet]
Yesterday I was almost taken in by the media's quotes of outraged tory bluster about Labour's broad band idea. Nobody blustering mentioned 'by 2030'. I wonder how soon the criticism will be spun around to make it sound like Labour's broadband policy is 'too little, too late' ?
I have had it with all the tory lies and, when you add in stuff like that above - can't even deal with flammable cladding, FFS - the tories are now Dead To Me.
I'm voting labour. The prancing ninnies, who will doubtless call me a deluded commie-loving IRA-supporting tosser, can absolutley do one.
[tweet]1195611042715447297[/tweet]