[Football] The Football Governance Bill

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,316
Glorious Goodwood
Standards
Is it going to change the value of what they say? It's not like they a presenting information to people who have the highest standards. Confromity is best avoided in my view, I don't trust people in suits, certainly not more than those in t-shirts.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,926
Parish putting the boot in 'IF the regulator is well informed... it could be a good thing'

In other words: 'We don't think you've got a clue'
 


Mackenzie

Old Brightonian
Nov 7, 2003
34,010
East Wales
Kieran Maguire spoke really well, oh to have that confidence.
 


dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,268
London
Wow ... Tony was cut off brutally at the beginning. And I hate to say it bit parish actually spoke better than Tony. Tony seemed a bit unprepared.

Also why has a billionaire only got one suit !!

Ps still love ya bloomy
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,926
Wow ... Tony was cut off brutally at the beginning. And I hate to say it bit parish actually spoke better than Tony. Tony seemed a bit unprepared.

Also why has a billionaire only got one suit !!

Ps still love ya bloomy
I thought they both complemented each other well. And both were visibly annoyed with ignorant questions from people who really don't know much.

I can imagine they will both be having a good bitch about it all on the way out.
 






portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
17,778
What are they exactly supposed to be doing / is it trying to achieve? If it’s an end to corruption in football and/or make it more competitive / look after the non rich 86 other clubs then…aren’t they pissing into the wind somewhat?
 


Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
Premier League clubs don’t want a regulator so will do whatever they can the derail it.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,706
The Fatherland
I hate to say it bit parish actually spoke better than Tony. Tony seemed a bit unprepared.
I thought the same. Bloom’s argument about not wanting to be like Germany, France and Spain where one or two clubs dominate wasn’t convincing on the day Man City pretty much won their 5th title in 6 seasons either.
 
Last edited:


Slum_Wolf

Well-known member
May 3, 2021
771
I thought the same. Bloom’s argument about not wanting to be like Germany, France and Spain where one or two clubs dominate wasn’t convincing on the day Man City pretty much won their 5th title in 6 seasons either.
To be fair Bloom must have only just arrived back from Belgium so was on high after seeing his team win the Belgian Cup for the first time since 1914 and grab a draw at Club Brugge in the league on Monday evening...Parish was just glad to have something else to read beyond architectural plans for imaginary main stand developments.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,008
Pattknull med Haksprut
The benefits of the regulator are more in sorrow than joy.

There are predators out there (and TB nor SP fall into that category and both spoke well) that see clubs as real estate opportunities (we have our own experience from the Goldstone) and there are others who utilise clubs for nefarious ends that I unfortunately can’t go into in detail.

The arguments against the regulator are

1: Cost. It will cost the PL, which spent £409m in agent Fees last year, £8m a year as a contribution to IR. That’s about £400k per club. Some of the work undertaken by IR can potentially replace what is dine by the PL, whose average cost per staff member is £141k
2: ‘Unintended consequences’ is a smokescreen for not wanting a revised distribution model with the EFL. The PL has ignored the unintended consequences of anchoring, FFP, selling more matches to broadcasters, bringing in new related party transactions rules part way through the season, EPPP and so on.
3; It might deter investors. Correct, it might deter investors such as Bill Archer, Steve Dale, Laurence Bassini, Lee Power, Ken Anderson and David Hilton. Those names may not mean much to some of you but ask fans of the clubs they were associated with.
4: UEFA/FIFA concerns about government interference in football. Yet we have banning orders, Alcohol bans, reselling of tickets, kettling by police and other restrictions as a result of legislation that applies to football and not other sports.
5; The Premier League is great as it is. This is the Premier League that is so great some of its members were behind SuperLeague, Project Big Picture, 39th Game, selling property to themselves to avoid PSR breaches, 115 charges and so on.

I genuinely feel sorry for Richard Masters, he looked a mess at Parlisment on Tuesday, it’s not worth the £1.9m a year if the job is going to have such an impact on his wellbeing.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top