Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 8,617
Potter is always about performances and those who booed were presumably booing the result, not the performance. He's correct in saying that his squad are performing very well considering the budget of the club and the teams that we are up against. It would be my guess that the booers have no complaints about league position, about young, talented players playing tactically flexible, progressive football. I reckon that virtually all are probably 100% behind the medium to long term project.
What he is not understanding is that for many who don't have his expertise to judge performances and improvement, watching this team generally look brilliant, but win less than 25% of home league matches for over two years is a bit psychologically draining. We are all Phil Connors waking up every morning to Sonny & Cher and some fans just seem to have reached the point when it feels like a good idea to steal Punxsutawney Phil and drive a truck off a cliff. I wouldn't join them, but it doesn't take someone with a postgraduate qualification in leadership and emotional intelligence to understand that their action was motivated by the same frustration and disappointment that he would have seen in his dressing room and to react to it in the same way.
And on some level I think the booing was about the clubs inability to remediate our shortcomings (demonstrated by having to field a player who was poor for Cincinatti).
But I agree, I think the groundhog day performances where we have tonnes of possession, do loads right but don't score might be having a cumulative effect.
I also think the Palace home game last season left more of a trauma with the fan base than is being accounted for. The sort of wound which you can understand the effect of much more as a long term fan than a manager. The thought of us going into the same fixture again but with a similar outcome is too much to bear.