BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,207
- Thread starter
- #61
I hate defending Hitchins but this is missing the point. You can't become an addict to something until you've taken it. You wouldn't know you were an addict until you've taken something for the first time. Hitchins' idea is that if you make sentencing much tougher it would deter people from trying it in the first place. He also argues that, even if it becomes something other than free will when taking a lot of drugs, the initial point of becoming addicted was a decision made by the user.
I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the idea that some people are able to extricate themselves of all free will by suggesting that they had a pre-disposition to become addicted. I'm also not sure that Hitchins claim that tougher sentencing would deter drugs is correct.
My feeling is that there are many factors which influence whether a person is going to taker drugs or not take drugs. Of these many factors legality is way down the list of influences.