It's great to se the Aussies squirm. However, I think Sydney might be an anticlimax. I'm told the forcast is very poor and there is unlikely to be a result (even with Australia's shabby batting)
It's great to se the Aussies squirm. However, I think Sydney might be an anticlimax. I'm told the forcast is very poor and there is unlikely to be a result (even with Australia's shabby batting)
Or they might even do what England always used to do: ie win a game once the series (or at least the Ashes) were already lost.
But this team will shirley want to WIN the series. I can't see us taking the foot off the gas AGAIN this series.
That post-match interview with Watson was class. When asked if Australia have any chance left in this game he couldn't bring himself to say no, and just gave a rueful smile.
Fair play to him to front up to the cameras and answer the hardest questions any Aussie has had to face for a long time. I admire the guy's spirit; he's a batting all-rounder who would ordinarily be coming in at 6 but for the deficiencies in this Aussie squad.
I agree, this team is different from previous sides and given their dominance in three out of four tests they will want to go on and win the series outright. 3-1 would be a fair reflection of their dominance IMO
How long will play last tonight ?
I cannot see the game lasting longer than lunch.
I'm liking Tim Bresnan a lot. He always seems like a good character to have around, he's come in having sat out most of the Tests so far and bowled really well (no sulking) and he did EASILY the best sprinkler impression out of all the England players.
Can't believe he's only 25/26 though. He looks about 35.
It's great to se the Aussies squirm. However, I think Sydney might be an anticlimax. I'm told the forcast is very poor and there is unlikely to be a result (even with Australia's shabby batting)
I thought Bresnan was a classic county trundler with a test career being a step too far, but he has restarted very positively. Good on him.