2-1 feels about right, but it could easily be 2-1 the other way too. The series held here are often close and really good contests, it’s rare that we get the same ebb and flow in the games and series down under and more often than not we are just trying to avoid being embarrassed (with the odd blip like 86/7 and 10/11 of course!).Well played England. Far better bowling selection produced good results, exposed Australia's out-of-sorts top order more than the previous line ups did. Stokes had genuine options to play with, changing the bowler changed the challenge the batters were facing instead of (in the first two tests) getting more of pretty much the same with a different face attached.
Still some very worrying problems in England's play, though - more dropped catches (particularly in Australia's first innings) that could have cost the match.
Really enjoying this series - all 3 matches have been too close to call until they were actually won, all 3 matches have had the pendulum swing from advantage one side to advantage the other multiple times. Some memorable bowling spells, some very memorable batting innings. It feels like any of a 2-3 / 3-2 / 2-2 result would be fair at this point.
I thought it odd that McGrath pointed to the fact that we had the best of the conditions, undoubtedly true, without mentioning the fact that we were at least one bowler down the whole game. He’s not the most even handed of pundits, I’m afraid! Funnily enough it’s worked the other way in other games, eg Lyon getting injured and that spell under lights at Edgbaston where we lost 2 key wickets. It just goes to show how the games have swung both ways with luck being on one side then the other. Can’t wait for the next two!